Eh yeah. I remember reading that. The boost is calculated at indexing
time.
That didn't even click. Thanks.
Andrzej Bialecki wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm pretty sure this is a bug or incompatibility with Luke - I'm using
boosted documents, and I seem to remember that Luke reported e
zej Bialecki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 23 January 2006 19:07
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Boost value and LUKE
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm pretty sure this is a bug or incompatibility with Luke - I'm using
> boosted documents, and I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm pretty sure this is a bug or incompatibility with Luke - I'm using
boosted documents, and I seem to remember that Luke reported everything
as 1.0, even though my test applications showed things correctly.
The boost in the final app is working fine, so the functiona
Eh,
I did some some tests after I sent the email to see if I was doing it
right and they confirmed your results. The scores were higher for
boosted content.
Thanks for the reply
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm pretty sure this is a bug or incompatibility with Luke - I'm using
boosted document
I'm pretty sure this is a bug or incompatibility with Luke - I'm using
boosted documents, and I seem to remember that Luke reported everything
as 1.0, even though my test applications showed things correctly.
The boost in the final app is working fine, so the functionality of
Lucene appears to be
