Re: CVS Lucene 2.0

2005-05-02 Thread Paul Elschot
On Monday 02 May 2005 06:01, Yonik Seeley wrote: > I can't say whats actually ready, but I am very interested in sparse > filter representations. I'm working on a project that needs to > dynamic categorization of search results, and this requires caching > thousands of filters. The need for many

Re: CVS Lucene 2.0

2005-05-01 Thread Yonik Seeley
I can't say whats actually ready, but I am very interested in sparse filter representations. I'm working on a project that needs to dynamic categorization of search results, and this requires caching thousands of filters. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32965 http://issues.apach

Re: CVS Lucene 2.0

2005-04-26 Thread Doug Cutting
Yonik Seeley wrote: I don't think at this point anything structural has been proposed as different between 1.9 and 2.0. Are any of Paul Elschot's query and scorer changes being considered for 2.0? 1.9 and 2.0 will be what's in the SVN trunk. Many of Paul's changes have already been committed. Ar

Re: CVS Lucene 2.0

2005-04-26 Thread Yonik Seeley
> I don't think at this point anything structural has been proposed as > different between 1.9 and 2.0. Are any of Paul Elschot's query and scorer changes being considered for 2.0? -Yonik - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECT

Re: CVS Lucene 2.0

2005-04-26 Thread Erik Hatcher
On Apr 26, 2005, at 9:12 AM, Peter Veentjer - Anchor Men wrote: How can I send the modified sources? Do they have to be checked? Submit patches in unified diff format to Lucene's issue tracking system - see the links on the Lucene site. And 1.9 is going to be backwards compatible, but 2.0? The go

RE: CVS Lucene 2.0

2005-04-26 Thread Peter Veentjer - Anchor Men
ik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: maandag 25 april 2005 17:48 Aan: java-user@lucene.apache.org Onderwerp: Re: CVS Lucene 2.0 On Apr 25, 2005, at 8:08 AM, Peter Veentjer - Anchor Men wrote: > Is the sourcecode of Lucene 2.0 accessable? I have looked on the site, > but I couldn`t fin

Re: CVS Lucene 2.0

2005-04-25 Thread Erik Hatcher
FYI... I'm working on the build process to include the contrib libraries at this moment. Once that is done, we can move forward with 1.9 RC1 release whenever it is deemed ready. Erik On Apr 25, 2005, at 4:08 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: George Aroush wrote: I would like to see a source relea

Re: CVS Lucene 2.0

2005-04-25 Thread Doug Cutting
George Aroush wrote: I would like to see a source release of 1.9, a packaged source release as ZIP/TAR. Is that possible? There is no 1.9 release. It is a *planned* release at this point. When a release is actually made, then you will be able to download it. Doug --

RE: CVS Lucene 2.0

2005-04-25 Thread George Aroush
: CVS Lucene 2.0 On Apr 25, 2005, at 8:08 AM, Peter Veentjer - Anchor Men wrote: > Is the sourcecode of Lucene 2.0 accessable? I have looked on the site, > but I couldn`t find a link. There has been no binary release of it. The codebase available from Subversion checkout and easily built wi

Re: CVS Lucene 2.0

2005-04-25 Thread Erik Hatcher
On Apr 25, 2005, at 8:08 AM, Peter Veentjer - Anchor Men wrote: Is the sourcecode of Lucene 2.0 accessable? I have looked on the site, but I couldn`t find a link. There has been no binary release of it. The codebase available from Subversion checkout and easily built with Ant is available using: