Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
--- "Kevin L. Cobb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Open Source C/C++ only? When are you going to include Open Source
Java? We demand fair treatmant ;)
There are several related sites:
http://www.searchmorph.com/
Thanks for ref Otis. I run this site, and primarily inde
--- "Kevin L. Cobb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Open Source C/C++ only? When are you going to include Open Source
> Java? We demand fair treatmant ;)
There are several related sites:
http://www.searchmorph.com/
http://www.koders.com/
http://javadocs.org/
...
Otis
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Open Source C/C++ only? When are you going to include Open Source Java?
We demand fair treatmant ;)
-Original Message-
From: Robert Schultz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, August 07, 2005 6:18 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: New Site Live Using Lucene
Not sure if
: I feel using Lucene's highlighter may make it easier to read the search
: results.
I'm of the opinion that since the result pages are all source code, syntax
highlighting is definitely the way to go, but given the existing
presentation, it does seem like it would make sense to "highlight" the
l
Yup, the C/C++ code is parsed using some templates I wrote utilizing
CodeWorker.
It would be possible to do the same thing to any other language such as
Java or PHP or Perl.
Although you'd need an expert understanding of that language's syntax in
order to successfully parse it correctly :)
Ini
This is cool!
Seems you parsed the C/C++ code. Is this easy to extend to other
languages, like Java?
And you choose to display the data stored in database, any reason for
that compared to reading it from Lucene index itself?
I feel using Lucene's highlighter may make it easier to read the search
