, April 15, 2010 2:13 PM
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: RE: NumericField indexing performance
>
> Hi Tomislav,
>
> when reading your mail its not 100% clear what you did wrong, but I
> think the following occurred (so its no GC problem):
>
> You reused
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> -Original Message-
> From: Otis Gospodnetic [mailto:otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2010 2:00 PM
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: NumericField indexing performance
>
> Hi,
>
> I a
adoop ecosystem search :: http://search-hadoop.com/
- Original Message
> From: Tomislav Poljak
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Thu, April 15, 2010 7:41:02 AM
> Subject: RE: NumericField indexing performance
>
> Hi Uwe,
thank you very much for your answers. I
.@thetaphi.de
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:u...@thetaphi.de]
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 11:28 PM
> > To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> > Subject: RE: NumericField indexing performance
> >
> > Hi Tomislav,
idea.
Uwe
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> -Original Message-
> From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:u...@thetaphi.de]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 11:28 PM
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: R
Hi Tomislav,
indexing with NumericField takes longer (at least for the default precision
step of 4, which means out of 32 bit integers make 8 subterms with each 4 bits
of the value). So you produce 8 times more terms during indexing that must be
handled by the indexer. If you have lots of docum
