Ditto Jack on ComplexPhraseQueryParser.
See also: https://issues.apache.org/jira/i#browse/LUCENE-5205
-Original Message-
From: Jack Krupansky [mailto:j...@basetechnology.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2014 6:59 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Wildcard searches
Take
for ComplexPhraseQueryParser that you may be aware of? I am looking for
some examples. Thanks!
Regards,
Raghu
-Original Message-
From: Allison, Timothy B. [mailto:talli...@mitre.org]
Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2014 8:02 AM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Wildcard searches
Ditto Jack
Message-
From: raghavendra.k@barclays.com [mailto:raghavendra.k@barclays.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2014 11:49 AM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Wildcard searches
Thank you, Tim.
I have read that ComplexPhraseQueryParser has issues while searching in more
than one
@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Wildcard searches
Sorry, you're right. I'm not sure that it analyzes multiterm components,
either. The Surround query parser also has similar limitations.
Best bet might be to compile:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/i#browse/LUCENE-5205 or
https://issues.apache.org/jira
]
Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2014 5:19 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Wildcard searches
Sorry, but I don't know what exactly you mean by compile from these locations.
Do you mean I could download and customize the code?
Regards,
Raghu
-Original Message-
From: Allison
Take a look at the complex phrase query parser.
See:
http://lucene.apache.org/core/4_6_0/queryparser/org/apache/lucene/queryparser/complexPhrase/ComplexPhraseQueryParser.html
See also:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1486
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From:
On 2/5/2014 6:30 PM, raghavendra.k@barclays.com wrote:
Hi,
Can Lucene support wildcard searches such as the ones shown below?
Indexed value is XYZ CORPORATION LIMITED.
If you index the value as a single token (KeywordTokenizer), there is
nothing really special about the examples you
/
/fields
Any clue?
Nic
-Original Message-
From: Ted Dunning [mailto:ted.dunn...@gmail.com]
Sent: 05 February 2010 21:18
To: gene...@lucene.apache.org
Cc: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Wildcard searches
This is quite close. You will have to break down the user
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crossposting
-Original Message-
From: Niclas Rothman [mailto:n...@lechill.com]
Sent: Saturday, February 06, 2010 12:12 AM
To: gene...@lucene.apache.org
Cc: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Wildcard searches
Hi Fuad and thanks for your reply
-Original Message-
From: Niclas Rothman [mailto:n...@lechill.com]
Sent: February-05-10 6:12 PM
To: gene...@lucene.apache.org
Cc: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Wildcard searches
Hi Fuad and thanks for your reply!
The first post I know now was a wrong approach, I
hard
coding...)
-Original Message-
From: Ted Dunning [mailto:ted.dunn...@gmail.com]
Sent: February-05-10 6:45 PM
To: gene...@lucene.apache.org
Cc: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Wildcard searches
Fuad,
I think that you took Niclas requirements backwards. He
You need to change multiTermRewriteMethod of QueryParser.
qp.setMultiTermRewriteMethod(MultiTermQuery.SCORING_BOOLEAN_QUERY_REWRITE);
Thanks. So the normal way of doing this is setting the rewrite method to
scoring, and if BooleanQuery.TooManyClauses is catched then switch back to
constant
: Wildcard searches and document boost
You need to change multiTermRewriteMethod of QueryParser.
qp.setMultiTermRewriteMethod(MultiTermQuery.SCORING_BOOLEAN_QUERY_REWRITE)
;
Thanks. So the normal way of doing this is setting the rewrite method to
scoring, and if BooleanQuery.TooManyClauses
WildcardQuery is a subclass of MultiTermQuery, read the javadocs about MTQ,
than you might understand whats going on and what you can do.
Uwe
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
-Original Message-
From: TorAtle
For instance, when searching for wash* I want
Washington (the city) to
appear before Washington Park, so I have boosted the
Washington
document. Unfortunately, when using WildcardQuery, the
score is always 1.0.
Luke says my query has been rewritten to
ConstantScore(myField:wash*), so
Thanks Steven and Antony.
I read the FAQ not very long ago, but that slipped my attention. Or
perhaps it's a recent change.
- Øystein -
--
Øystein Reigem, The department of culture, language and information technology (Aksis), Allegt
27, N-5007 Bergen, Norway. Tel: +47 55 58 32 42. Fax: +47
It's possible to do leading wildcard searches in Lucene as of 2.1. See
http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/LuceneFAQ#head-4d62118417eaef0dcb87f4370583f809848ea695
(http://tinyurl.com/366suf)
-Original Message-
From: Oystein Reigem [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007
I have read that with Lucene it is not possible to do wildcard searches
with * or ? as the first character. Wildcard searches with * as the
Lucene supports it. If you are using QueryParser to parse your queries see
18 matches
Mail list logo
