Hello Nicola,
I think it would be good if you start a new thread to discuss this problem,
as I don't think it's related to the issue in this thread.
Also, I did not understand what's the problem you're running into. What
used to work before 4.2 and doesn't work now?
Shai
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at
Hi,
I'm trying to use Lucene 4.2, but this merge of more taxonomy indexes
seam is no more working.
Do you have any idea why it has not to work in Lucene 4.2?
Normal faceted search on a single index is working correctly.
Nicola.
On Thu, 2013-01-24 at 16:53 +, Nicola Buso wrote:
> Hi Shai,
>
Hi Shai,
I'd like just to give you a confirmation that your solution is working
after the tests I did.
Thanks again for the useful hints.
Nicola.
On Tue, 2013-01-22 at 06:20 +0200, Shai Erera wrote:
> Hi Nicola,
>
> What I had in mind is something similar to this, which is possible starting
>
Thanks Shai,
I'm trying your solution and it's working, I need to check some number
to test it.
As I said we are aware having big indexes, than I use facets only on
subsets, but if it will result in performances issues too than I'll for
sure take a look into facet sampling.
Nicola.
On Wed, 2013
>
> I think we should open an issue to provide support for distributed
> faceting?
>
Opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4710.
BTW Nicola, I remember you said something about TBs of indexes. I just
wanted to point out that if you have really large indexes, with many
documents, the
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 11:20 PM, Shai Erera wrote:
> (unfortunately, there's still no tool in Lucene to do that for you).
I think we should open an issue to provide support for distributed faceting?
For example, we already provide support for distributed searching
(TopDocs.merge), and distribu
Yes, the release is wrapping up. I believe that an announcement message
will be sent in the coming days.
Shai
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Nicola Buso wrote:
> I will try it.
>
> I see there is already a lucene-4.1.0 package (dated 2013/01/21)
> available for download, do you know if this
I will try it.
I see there is already a lucene-4.1.0 package (dated 2013/01/21)
available for download, do you know if this version will be released
soon?
Nicola.
On Tue, 2013-01-22 at 06:20 +0200, Shai Erera wrote:
> Hi Nicola,
>
> What I had in mind is something similar to this, which is pos
Hi Nicola,
What I had in mind is something similar to this, which is possible starting
with Lucene 4.1, due to changes done to facets (per-segment faceting):
DirTaxoWriter master = new DirTaxoWriter(masterDir);
Directory[] origTaxoDirs = new Directory[numTaxoDirs]; // open Directories
and store i
We have similar distribute search system and we have finished with the
following scheme. Search replicas (machines where index resides) are build
FacetResult's based on their index chunk (top N categories with document
counts). Later on the results are merged "by hands" with summing relevant
ca
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,
it's not clear your proposal.
On Mon, 2013-01-21 at 18:21 +0200, Shai Erera wrote:
> Hi
>
>
> First, if it's a one time operation, you can merge the taxonomy
> indexes into one, without merging the content indexes too (but you'll
> need to re-map the ordinals in each
Hi Shai,
I was thinking to that too, but I'm indexing all indexes in a custom
distributed environment than I can't in this moment have a single
categories index for all the content indexes at indexing time.
A solution should be to merge all the categories indexes in one only
index and use your sol
Hi Nicola,
I think that what you're describing corresponds to distributed faceted
search. I.e., you have N content indexes, alongside N taxonomy indexes.
The information that's indexed in each of those sub-indexes does not
correlate with the other ones.
For example, say that you index the category
Thanks for the reply Uwe,
we currently can search with MultiReader over all the indexes we have.
Now I want to add the faceting search, than I created a categories index
for every index I currently have.
To accumulate the faceted results now I have a MultiReader pointing all
the indexes and I can
Just use MultiReader, it extends IndexReader, so you can pass it anywhere where
IndexReader can be passed.
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> -Original Message-
> From: Nicola Buso [mailto:nb...@ebi.ac.uk]
> Sent: Mon
15 matches
Mail list logo
