Re: Index not recreated

[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Verzonden: maandag 14 augustus 2006 16:52 > Aan: java-user@lucene.apache.org > Onderwerp: Re: Index not recreated > > You have all my sympathy. Let me see if I can restate your > problem. > > "Hey Ron. The indexing process doesn't work. We ca

RE: Index not recreated

> Van: Jason Polites [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Verzonden: dinsdag 15 augustus 2006 2:28 > Onderwerp: Re: Index not recreated > > The "intermittent" nature of your problem points to a > concurrency issue. > Does the production environment have a greater number o

RE: Index not recreated

> Van: Erick Erickson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Verzonden: maandag 14 augustus 2006 16:52 > Aan: java-user@lucene.apache.org > Onderwerp: Re: Index not recreated > > You have all my sympathy. Let me see if I can restate your > problem. > > "Hey Ron. The i

Re: Index not recreated

e if > this > applies to you > > Good luck! > Erick > > On 8/14/06, Ronald Wildenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > > > Thanks for your response, comments are below. I'm using Lucene 1.9.1. > > > > > > > Van: Erick Erickson [ma

Re: Index not recreated

ther kinds of issues, you might want to search the archive if this applies to you Good luck! Erick On 8/14/06, Ronald Wildenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thanks for your response, comments are below. I'm using Lucene 1.9.1. > > > > Van: Erick Erickson [mailto:[EM

Re: Index not recreated

her kinds of issues, you might want to search the archive if this applies to you Good luck! Erick On 8/14/06, Ronald Wildenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Thanks for your response, comments are below. I'm using Lucene 1.9.1. > Van: Erick Erickson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT

RE: Index not recreated

Thanks for your response, comments are below. I'm using Lucene 1.9.1. > Van: Erick Erickson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Verzonden: maandag 14 augustus 2006 16:20 > Onderwerp: Re: Index not recreated > > My first suspicion is that you have duplicate documents on > t

Re: Index not recreated

My first suspicion is that you have duplicate documents on the *input* side, or are somehow adding documents more than once. I use code similar to yours and it works just fine for me. How big is the index before and after you re-create it? Twice the size and you're appending, not twice then..