Re: Problem in lucene query

2009-09-10 Thread Erick Erickson
Also, get a copy of Luke and examine your index, that'll tell you what isactually in there *and* it will let you see how queries parse under various analyzers. Best Erick On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 6:47 AM, vibhuti wrote: > Hello > > > > I am new to Lucene and facing a problem while performing

Re: Problem in lucene query

2009-09-10 Thread Anshum
Hi Vibhuti, Not in sync with your query, but I'd advice you to graduate you to a rather recent lucene release. Something like 2.4.1 or atleast a 2.3.1 [Considering its already time for 2.9]. -- Anshum Gupta Naukri Labs! http://ai-cafe.blogspot.com The facts expressed here belong to everybody, the

Re: Problem in lucene query

2009-09-10 Thread AHMET ARSLAN
> I am new to Lucene and facing a problem while performing > searches. I am using lucene 2.2.0. > > My application indexes documents on "keyword" field which > contains integer values. Which analyzer/tokenizer are you using on that field? I am assuming it is a tokenized field. >If the value is

Re: Problem in Lucene

2007-07-31 Thread Srinivasarao Vundavalli
The code that is making use of that makeStopFilter is not written by me. It has read-only permission. So, I can't make any changes to it. On 7/31/07, Erick Erickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Why not fix your code to be 2.1 compliant instead? For instance, > StopFilter has a constructor that t

Re: Problem in Lucene

2007-07-31 Thread Erick Erickson
Why not fix your code to be 2.1 compliant instead? For instance, StopFilter has a constructor that takes Set and a constructor that takes an array of String for stopwords. Otherwise, please tell us more about what you are doing with MakeStopTable and why making your code 2.1 compliant isn't an op