Re: Lucene trunk update question. WAS RE: search performance enhancement

2005-09-26 Thread Erik Hatcher
On Sep 26, 2005, at 3:10 AM, Paul Elschot wrote: I used my bug votes already. I hope more people will do that, hint: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/BrowseProject.jspa?id=12310110 Is there a way to view the open issues sorted by number of votes? There is the "Popular Issues" view: <

Re: Lucene trunk update question. WAS RE: search performance enhancement

2005-09-26 Thread Paul Elschot
Otis, On Monday 26 September 2005 00:37, Otis Gospodnetic wrote: > As Erik Hatcher noted in another email (it might have been on the -dev > list), we'll go through JIRA before making the next release and try to > push the patches like this one into the core. Personally, it has been I used my bug

Re: Lucene trunk update question. WAS RE: search performance enhancement

2005-09-25 Thread Otis Gospodnetic
OTECTED] > > Sent: 21 September 2005 19:16 > > To: java-user@lucene.apache.org > > Subject: Re: search performance enhancement > > > > On Wednesday 21 September 2005 03:29, John Wang wrote: > > > Hi Paul and other gurus: > > > > > > In a r

Re: Lucene trunk update question. WAS RE: search performance enhancement

2005-09-22 Thread Paul Elschot
September 2005 19:16 > To: java-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: search performance enhancement > > On Wednesday 21 September 2005 03:29, John Wang wrote: > > Hi Paul and other gurus: > > > > In a related topic, seems lucene is scoring documents that wou

Lucene trunk update question. WAS RE: search performance enhancement

2005-09-22 Thread Peter Gelderbloem
:16 To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: search performance enhancement On Wednesday 21 September 2005 03:29, John Wang wrote: > Hi Paul and other gurus: > > In a related topic, seems lucene is scoring documents that would hit in a > "prohibited" boolean clause, e.

Re: search performance enhancement

2005-09-21 Thread Paul Elschot
On Wednesday 21 September 2005 03:29, John Wang wrote: > Hi Paul and other gurus: > > In a related topic, seems lucene is scoring documents that would hit in a > "prohibited" boolean clause, e.g. NOT field:value. It doesn't seem to make > sense to score a document that is to be excluded from the

Re: search performance enhancement

2005-09-20 Thread John Wang
Hi Paul and other gurus: In a related topic, seems lucene is scoring documents that would hit in a "prohibited" boolean clause, e.g. NOT field:value. It doesn't seem to make sense to score a document that is to be excluded from the result. Is this a difficult thing to fix? Also in Paul's ealie

Re: search performance enhancement

2005-08-19 Thread Paul Elschot
On Friday 19 August 2005 18:09, John Wang wrote: > Hi Paul: > > Thanks for the pointer. > >How would I extend from the patch you submitted to filter out > more documents not using a Filter. e.g. > > have a class to skip documents based on a docID: boolean > isValid(int docID)

Re: search performance enhancement

2005-08-19 Thread John Wang
Hi Paul: Thanks for the pointer. How would I extend from the patch you submitted to filter out more documents not using a Filter. e.g. have a class to skip documents based on a docID: boolean isValid(int docID) My problem is I want to discard documents at query time wit

Re: search performance enhancement

2005-08-16 Thread Paul Elschot
Hi John, On Wednesday 17 August 2005 04:46, John Wang wrote: > Hi: > >I posted a bug (36147) a few days ago and didn't hear anything, so > I thought I'd try my luck on this list. > >The idea is to avoid score calculations on documents to be filtered > out anyway. (e.g. via Filter object