: Subject: Search Across All Fields
: References: <49710068.1090...@gmail.com>
: <3994e409-bff0-4348-9d84-4c762b150...@gmail.com>
: In-Reply-To: <3994e409-bff0-4348-9d84-4c762b150...@gmail.com>
http://people.apache.org/~hossman/#threadhijack
Thread Hijacking on Mailing List
Hi Erick
Thanks for the pointer. I dont know how I missed that. Our index sizes
are absolutely huge so its not really practical in putting an all_text
field. It would great if you could introduce a macro or something that
one could use to specify all fields.
Thanks anyway!
Jamie
Erick Eri
recipient:supply body:supply
> attachments:supply attachname:supply) AND sentdate:[d2008111701 TO
> d20090117235900]
>
> Query 1 returns 138 results, while Query 2 return 0 result. Any idea why?
> The second query is meant to offer the search across all fields, whereas the
> fir
Hi,
Inside (priority:beauty ..) there is an AND,
is that operator what you want?
Best regards, Lisheng
-Original Message-
From: Jamie [mailto:ja...@stimulussoft.com]
Sent: Friday, January 16, 2009 3:02 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Search Across All Fields
Hi Everyone
I
The second query is meant to offer the search across all fields,
whereas the first query specifies one field. Is there a better way to
conduct a search across all fields? Am I missing something?
Thanks in advance for your help!
Regar
