Re: Strange performance of Lucene 4.4.0

2013-09-10 Thread Adrien Grand
;>> the "Empty Sort()" bug? I should probably use Sort.INDEXORDER for sorting, >>> right? It gives me the same result... >>> >>> Thanks in advance >>> Mirko >>> >>> >>> >>> Gesendet: Montag, 09. September 2013 um

Re: Strange performance of Lucene 4.4.0

2013-09-09 Thread Mirko Sertic
in advance Mirko Gesendet: Montag, 09. September 2013 um 13:03 Uhr Von: "Michael McCandless" An: "Lucene Users" Betreff: Re: Re: Re: Strange performance of Lucene 4.4.0 If new Sort() fails to sort by score, that's a bug! Can you please open a Jira issue? Mike McCandl

Re: Re: Re: Re: Strange performance of Lucene 4.4.0

2013-09-09 Thread Michael McCandless
sorting, right? It > gives me the same result... > > Thanks in advance > Mirko > > > > Gesendet: Montag, 09. September 2013 um 13:03 Uhr > Von: "Michael McCandless" > An: "Lucene Users" > Betreff: Re: Re: Re: Strange performance of Lucene 4

Aw: Re: Re: Re: Strange performance of Lucene 4.4.0

2013-09-09 Thread Mirko Sertic
Empty Sort()" bug? I should probably use Sort.INDEXORDER for sorting, right? It gives me the same result... Thanks in advance Mirko     Gesendet: Montag, 09. September 2013 um 13:03 Uhr Von: "Michael McCandless" An: "Lucene Users" Betreff: Re: Re: Re: Strange performan

Re: Re: Re: Strange performance of Lucene 4.4.0

2013-09-09 Thread Michael McCandless
5 Uhr > Von: "Toke Eskildsen" > An: "java-user@lucene.apache.org" > Betreff: Re: Aw: Re: Strange performance of Lucene 4.4.0 > On Sun, 2013-09-08 at 15:15 +0200, Mirko Sertic wrote: >> I have to check, but my usecase does not require sorting or even >> sc

Aw: Re: Re: Strange performance of Lucene 4.4.0

2013-09-09 Thread Mirko Sertic
An: "java-user@lucene.apache.org" Betreff: Re: Aw: Re: Strange performance of Lucene 4.4.0 On Sun, 2013-09-08 at 15:15 +0200, Mirko Sertic wrote: > I have to check, but my usecase does not require sorting or even > scoring at all. I still do not get what the difference is... Pleas

Re: Aw: Re: Strange performance of Lucene 4.4.0

2013-09-09 Thread Toke Eskildsen
On Sun, 2013-09-08 at 15:15 +0200, Mirko Sertic wrote: > I have to check, but my usecase does not require sorting or even > scoring at all. I still do not get what the difference is... Please describe how you perform your measurements. How do you ensure that the index is warmed equally for the two

Aw: Re: Strange performance of Lucene 4.4.0

2013-09-08 Thread Mirko Sertic
HI I have to check, but my usecase does not require sorting or even scoring at all. I still do not get what the difference is... Regards Mirko     Gesendet: Sonntag, 08. September 2013 um 12:21 Uhr Von: "Roberto Ragusa" An: java-user@lucene.apache.org Betreff: Re: Strange perf

Re: Strange performance of Lucene 4.4.0

2013-09-08 Thread Roberto Ragusa
On 09/07/2013 04:59 PM, Mirko Sertic wrote: > Hi@all > > I am getting strange performance measures on Lucene 4.4.0, maybe someone can > explain this: > > The following syntax leads to pretty slow queries on my machine(16ms for > every execution): > > theSearcher.search(theQuery, null, theSe

Strange performance of Lucene 4.4.0

2013-09-07 Thread Mirko Sertic
Hi@all I am getting strange performance measures on Lucene 4.4.0, maybe someone can explain this: The following syntax leads to pretty slow queries on my machine(16ms for every execution): theSearcher.search(theQuery, null, theSearcher.getIndexReader().maxDoc()); but the following syntax