am now talking about thread hijacking? But, I
> : suppose that would have been you. ;-)
>
> This is my standard reply to anyone (i notice) who thread hijacks on one
> of the Lucene lists.
>
> In this case the message with the subject "Suggested number of fields
> limit per In
(i notice) who thread hijacks on one
of the Lucene lists.
In this case the message with the subject "Suggested number of fields
limit per Index" which should have been a new thread was in fact a reply
to messageId [EMAIL PROTECTED] (subject: "Is there a
mavenized Lucene bundle in
er <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> : Subject: Suggested number of fields limit per Index
> : In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> : References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> http://people.apache.org/~hossman/#threadhijack
>
> Thread Hijacking on Mailing Lists
: Subject: Suggested number of fields limit per Index
: In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://people.apache.org/~hossman/#threadhijack
Thread Hijacking on Mailing Lists
When starting a new discussion on a mailing list, please do not reply to
--Original Message-
From: Grant Ingersoll [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2008 1:03 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Suggested number of fields limit per Index
Another issues is how to generate queries. If you have hundreds of
fields, you may have
the line.
Thanks again for your help.
-Chunhe
-Original Message-
From: Grant Ingersoll [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2008 1:03 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Suggested number of fields limit per Index
Another issues is how to generate queries
Another issues is how to generate queries. If you have hundreds of
fields, you may have to generate queries (e.g. using the
MultfieldQueryParser) across all those fields just to find documents
that _could_ have those fields. This can lead to the dreaded
TooManyClausesException.
That bei
I'll give a quick opinion, and remember that is all it is.
Without more information of the types of documents your are storing, I
would say you are definitely going in the wrong direction. In my
opinion, an index should describe the common attributes of all the
documents it contains. You should
ou can opt to omit norms for a choice of field or if you have
specify indexed field as untokenized.
Cheers,
Mark
- Original Message
From: "Dai, Chunhe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, 3 January, 2008 4:45:05 PM
Subject: Suggested number
I have been searching online could not find an exact answer; and
wondering if anyone here knows whether there is a preferred max number
of fields limit in lucene index?
We are in the process of deciding how our index would look like in our
lucene integration. For one of our approach, we could have
10 matches
Mail list logo
