Hey Sergey,
With that kind of a dimension I guess you could work with multiple fields. I
have tried it over a score of fields for over 10 million documents. Works
fine if implemented neatly.
Is there more that you would be doing other than vanilla search?
--
Anshum Gupta
Naukri Labs!
On Thu, Jul
The best strategy.
Hello.
I want to ask you opinion about to How
store multiple fields of same document.
I see now two possibility's.
1. Multiple fields in document
2. One filed: for example named PROPERTIES, with multiple instances.
And values combined with name for example [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'd go with option 1 unless and until you could demonstrate performance
problems. Speaking of which, you'd get a more informed answer if you
provided a bit more data, like how many fields are we talking, how many
documents, etc. If you're indexing 10,000 documents, go with the simplest.
If you're
Thank you Erick.
I'm talking about more then 10,000 documents and 95% less then 10 fields.
Maximum number of fields per document is unlimited.
But in practice it's no more the 20.
I'm interesting: does Lucene have any internal optimization,
which depend of the fields count or fields
Haven't a clue G.
Erick
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 11:29 AM, Sergey Kabashnyuk [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Thank you Erick.
I'm talking about more then 10,000 documents and 95% less then 10 fields.
Maximum number of fields per document is unlimited.
But in practice it's no more the 20.
I'm
