Hi,
In our application, we will allow the user to create a primary key defined in
the document. We are using lucene 2.9.
In this case, when we index the data coming from the client, if the metadata
contains the primary key defined,
we have to do the search/update for every row based on the pr
The usual way to do this is to use:
IndexWriter.updateDocument(Term, Document)
This method deletes all documents with the given Term in it (this would be
your primary key), and then adds the Document you want to add. This is the
traditional way to do updates, and it is fast.
-jake
On Mo
What is the form of the unique key? I'm a bit confused here by your comment:
"which can contain one or multi fields".
But it seems like IndexWriter.deleteDocuments should work here. It's easy
if your PKs are single terms, there's even a deleteDocuments(Term[]) form.
But this really *requires* that
Sorry, forgot to add "then re-add the documents in question".
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 12:45 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> What is the form of the unique key? I'm a bit confused here by your
> comment:
> "which can contain one or multi fields".
>
> But it seems like IndexWriter.deleteDocuments shoul
What I mean is that for one index, client can defined multi field in the index
as the primary key (composite key).
> Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:45:40 -0500
> Subject: Re: What is the best way to handle the primary key case during
> lucene indexing
> From: erickerick...@gm
But can IndexWriter.updateDocument(Term, Document) handle the composite key
case?
If my primary key contains field1 and field2, can I use one Term to include
both field1 and field2?
Thanks
> Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 09:44:35 -0800
> Subject: Re: What is the best way to handle the prima
09 09:44:35 -0800
> > Subject: Re: What is the best way to handle the primary key case during
> luceneindexing
> > From: jake.man...@gmail.com
> > To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> >
> > The usual way to do this is to use:
> >
> >IndexWriter.upd
nd field2?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > > Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 09:44:35 -0800
> > > Subject: Re: What is the best way to handle the primary key case during
> > luceneindexing
> > > From: jake.man...@gmail.com
> > > To: java-user@lucene.apache