ache.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 12:04:33 AM
Subject: Re: AW: feedback: Indexing speed improvement lucene 2.2->2.3.1
Hi Otis,
I checked that contrib before and could not find NgramStemFilter. Am I
missing other contrib?
Thanks for the link!
Jay
Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
Hi Jay,
Sorry
dependent searching.
Regards Uwe
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: yu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 26. März 2008 05:26
An: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: feedback: Indexing speed improvement lucene 2.2->2.3.1
Sorry for my ignorance, I am looking for
Ng
ect: Re: AW: feedback: Indexing speed improvement lucene 2.2->2.3.1
Hi Otis,
I checked that contrib before and could not find NgramStemFilter. Am I
missing other contrib?
Thanks for the link!
Jay
Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
Hi Jay,
Sorry, lapsus calami, that would be Lucene *contrib*.
Hav
gt;
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 12:04:33 AM
Subject: Re: AW: feedback: Indexing speed improvement lucene 2.2->2.3.1
Hi Otis,
I checked that contrib before and could not find NgramStemFilter. Am I
missing other contrib?
Thanks for the link!
Jay
Otis Gospodne
/index.html
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
From: Jay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 6:15:54 PM
Subject: Re: AW: feedback: Indexing speed improvement lucene 2.2->2.3.1
Sorry, I could
a-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 6:15:54 PM
Subject: Re: AW: feedback: Indexing speed improvement lucene 2.2->2.3.1
Sorry, I could not find the filter in the 2.3 API class list (core +
contrib + test). I am not ware of lucene config file either. Could you
please tell me where it
- Original Message
From: Jay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 1:32:24 PM
Subject: Re: AW: feedback: Indexing speed improvement lucene 2.2->2.3.1
Hi Uwe,
I am curious what NGramStemFilter is? Is it a combination of porter
stemming an
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
From: Jay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 1:32:24 PM
Subject: Re: AW: feedback: Indexing speed improvement lucene 2.2->2.3.1
Hi Uwe,
I am curious
21. März 2008 16:25
An: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Betreff: Re: feedback: Indexing speed improvement lucene 2.2->2.3.1
Hi Uwe,
Could you tell what Analyzer do you use when you marked so big indexing
speedup?
If you use StandardAnalyzer (that uses StandardTokenizer) may be the
reason is in i
EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 25. März 2008 17:13
An: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Betreff: Re: feedback: Indexing speed improvement lucene 2.2->2.3.1
Uwe,
This is a little off thread-topic, but I was wondering how your
search relevance and search performance has fared with this
bigr
query, scoring in a doc the greatest bigramms clusters covering the phrase
> token.
>
> Best Regards
>
> Uwe
>
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Ivan Vasilev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Gesendet: Freitag, 21. März 2008 16:25
> An: java-user@lucene.apache.
ing in a doc the greatest bigramms clusters
covering the phrase token.
Best Regards
Uwe
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Ivan Vasilev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Freitag, 21. März 2008 16:25
An: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Betreff: Re: feedback: Indexing speed improvement lucene 2.
ava-user@lucene.apache.org
Betreff: Re: feedback: Indexing speed improvement lucene 2.2->2.3.1
Hi Uwe,
Could you tell what Analyzer do you use when you marked so big
indexing
speedup?
If you use StandardAnalyzer (that uses StandardTokenizer) may be the
reason is in it. You can see the pre last report in
mms clusters covering the phrase
token.
Best Regards
Uwe
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Ivan Vasilev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Freitag, 21. März 2008 16:25
An: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Betreff: Re: feedback: Indexing speed improvement lucene 2.2->2.3.1
Hi Uwe,
Could you tel
Hi Uwe,
Could you tell what Analyzer do you use when you marked so big indexing
speedup?
If you use StandardAnalyzer (that uses StandardTokenizer) may be the
reason is in it. You can see the pre last report in the thread "Indexing
Speed: 2.3 vs 2.2 (real world numbers)". According to the repor
That is a nice result -- thanks for reporting this Uwe!
Mike
On Mar 1, 2008, at 3:45 AM, Uwe Goetzke wrote:
This week I switched the lucene library version on one customer
system.
The indexing speed went down from 46m32s to 16m20s for the complete
task
including optimisation. Great Job!
This week I switched the lucene library version on one customer system.
The indexing speed went down from 46m32s to 16m20s for the complete task
including optimisation. Great Job!
We index product catalogs from several suppliers, in this case around
56.000 product groups and 360.000 products inclu
17 matches
Mail list logo
