The example code in
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Problem-searching-in-the-same-sentence-td1501269.html
reads
custom standard analyzer:
public class MyStandardAnalyzer extends StandardAnalyzer implements
IndexFields {
public MyStandardAnalyzer(Version matchVersion) {
Conceptually, I think I know what to do. Unfortunately, with the given
interfaces of Lucene I have some difficulty.
If I add the content of a document sentence by sentence, i.e. line by
line, (using a multi-valued field), there are only two constructors
possible:
Field(String name, String val
Another index, or a different field in the same index but without the
modified gaps. Maybe PerFieldAnalyzerWrapper would help - one
Analyzer for field x with modified gaps and a different one for field
y with standard gaps.
--
Ian.
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 2:40 PM, Michael Wiegand
wrote:
> Than
Thank you for all these useful hints!
If I use the multi-valued fields in combination with "modified" position
increments, I would actually distort the shape of a document.
For instance, if I would like to compare a retrieval enforcing query
term co-occurrence within the same sentence with a co
You can use multi valued fields if you play with the position
increment gap. See e.g.
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Problem-searching-in-the-same-sentence-td1501269.html
A google search for "lucene indexing sentences" or similar finds that, and more.
Different docs can have different field
Hi,
I would like to create an index with Lucene to a document collections of
text files.
The index should be created in such a way, that for the search I can
enforce that query term A and query term B are contained within the same
sentence.
How should implement the index? Should I have for e
