lna...@googlemail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2011 2:30 AM
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: questions about searching lucene 3.2
>
> As far as I understand you have 2 different problems.
>
> 1. search and 2.4 index with 3.2 code using standard analyzer.
> in
ry still didn't work.
Also, is there any downside to just continuing with the ClassicAnalyzer?
Bob
-Original Message-
From: Simon Willnauer [mailto:simon.willna...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2011 2:30 AM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: questions about searchin
well as the
> ComplexPhraseQueryParser.
>
> One other point to note. The indexes I'm searching were created with 2.1.4
> using the StandardAnalyzer but I'm using 3.2.0 to search.
>
> Bob
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Bob Rhodes [mailto:bob.rho...@trss
he
ComplexPhraseQueryParser.
One other point to note. The indexes I'm searching were created with 2.1.4
using the StandardAnalyzer but I'm using 3.2.0 to search.
Bob
-----Original Message-
From: Bob Rhodes [mailto:bob.rho...@trssllc.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 11:56 AM
To:
Hi all,
I have some questions about searching 3.2. I have just upgraded from 2.4.1
to 3.2. I am using the standard analyzer to create the index and to search,
and one of the fields is called "querytext" and it has content like this
among other things: phoneNumber="(904) 555-1212". I've tried many d