Hello.
I am going to switch to newest (4.10.2) version of Lucene and I'd like to
make some optimization in my index and code. I would like to use
DocValuesField to get values but also for filtering and sorting. So here I
have some questions: If I'd like to use range filter
(FieldCacheRangeFilter) I
Hello.
I am going to switch to newest (4.10.2) version of Lucene and I'd like to
make some optimization in my index and code. I would like to use
DocValuesField to get values but also for filtering and sorting. So here I
have some questions: If I'd like to use range filter
(FieldCacheRangeFilter) I
Hello.
Thanks for your replay.
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 3:14 PM, Adrien Grand wrote:
>
> Hi Piotr,
>
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 9:43 PM, Piotr Idzikowski
> wrote:
> > Hello.
> > I am going to switch to newest (4.10.2) version of Lucene and I'd like to
> >
>
>
>> So for instance if I store documents with ie creation date and I have a
> data (millions of documents) from last let's say 3 years and I'd like to do
> range filter to get socs from some month only is it better to use ordinary
> numeric query instead of FieldCacheRangeQuery?
>
> Of course I
Hello.
I have a performance problem with Lucene search queries running on Java
7u71 Linux platform. I use the newest 4.10 version, but we also experience
the same problem with Lucene 4.7.2.
I observed that after some time (1 or 2 days), even without any heavy use,
Lucene search and count slow dow
on in Lucene installation manuals. It
is quite interesting that the article refrains from using the word "bug"
(be it of Lucene, Java or OS origin), while in our opinion it is the most
accurate term for this rather bizarre case.
Regards
Piotr
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 9:32 PM, Piotr Idzikowski
Hello.
A little bit delayed question. But recently I have found this articles:
https://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrPerformanceProblems
https://wiki.apache.org/solr/ShawnHeisey#GC_Tuning
Especially this part from first url:
*Using the ConcurrentMarkSweep (CMS) collector with tuning parameters is a
ver
yway), G1GC seems to
> work well with Lucene.
>
> Jim
> ________
> From: Piotr Idzikowski [[email protected]]
> Sent: Friday, February 06, 2015 5:35 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Lucene Version Upgrade (3->4)
old array content into the new one.
Regards
Piotr Idzikowski
here is the output:
300*a: 0
255*a: 1
45*a: 1
TERMS
45: a
255:
aaa
Regards
Piotr
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Steve Rowe wrote:
> Hi Piotr,
>
> Thanks for reporting!
>
> See https://issues.apach
I should add that this is Lucene 4.10.4.
But I have checked it on the 5.2.1 version and I have got the same result
Regards
Piotr
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 9:44 AM, Piotr Idzikowski wrote:
> Hello Steve,
> It is always pleasure to help you develop such a great lib.
> Talk
Hello.
Btw, I think ClassicAnalyzer has the same problem
Regards
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Steve Rowe wrote:
> Hi Piotr,
>
> Thanks for reporting!
>
> See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6682
>
> Steve
> www.lucidworks.com
>
> > On Jul 16, 2
12 matches
Mail list logo
