So, this means no Java3D 1.2 release?
regards,
On Sun, 14 May 2000, Jim Schatzman wrote:
> We have observed some real show-stopper problems with all versions of J3D 1.2
> to the point where we find it unusable. Specific problems with Beta 2 include:
>
> 1. Performance. Although in some cases
Hi Jim,
>
>3. When a Shape3D is removed from a live tree in J3D 1.1.3 and earlier it can
>then be modified. In all versions of J3D 1.2, Java throws an exception claiming
>that the Shape3D is still live. A go-around is to place the Shape3D in a
>BranchGroup
>before adding it to the tree, and then
, 2000 11:46 PM
Subject: [JAVA3D] Java 3D 1.2 Beta 2 vs 1.1.3 Issues
> We have observed some real show-stopper problems with all versions of J3D
1.2
> to the point where we find it unusable. Specific problems with Beta 2
include:
>
> 1. Performance. Although in some cases static compile
We have observed some real show-stopper problems with all versions of J3D 1.2
to the point where we find it unusable. Specific problems with Beta 2 include:
1. Performance. Although in some cases static compiled scenes give higher
frame rates (about 2x) vs J3D 1.1.3, dynamically changing scenes
