Re: RFR: JEP 359-Records: javadoc code

2019-10-18 Thread Jonathan Gibbons
Generally, for historical reasons I accept, the jx.l.m model API has not been very friendly with helpful utility methods, going for a more minimalist approach, although I sense that is changing, maybe in part because of default methods. With respect to accessing the canonical constructor, I wo

Re: RFR: JEP 359-Records: javadoc code

2019-10-18 Thread Maurizio Cimadamore
I went through the javadoc changes and, although I'm no javadoc expert, they seem clean enough, to the point that I could follow the logic quite easily. One high-level gripe which is pointing at a failure of the j.l.model API is the lack of a way to get to the canonical constructor directly; w