On Wed, 11 Aug 2021 17:38:49 GMT, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
> Please review a do-over of JDK-8249634, to report a missing doc comment when
> an implicit/default constructor is used.
>
> The `src` code is the same as before. The previous version had missing test
> files (now added), and had a t
On Fri, 9 Jul 2021 19:17:04 GMT, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
> Please review a simple change to the code for generating docs for JavaFX
> properties, in order to suppress an inappropriate
> "missing comment" warning.
>
> The change is to use `hasDocCommentTree` instead of `getDocCommentTree`.
>
>
On Wed, 11 Aug 2021 17:38:49 GMT, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
> Please review a do-over of JDK-8249634, to report a missing doc comment when
> an implicit/default constructor is used.
>
> The `src` code is the same as before. The previous version had missing test
> files (now added), and had a t
Please review a do-over of JDK-8249634, to report a missing doc comment when an
implicit/default constructor is used.
The `src` code is the same as before. The previous version had missing test
files (now added), and had a test fail because an interaction with another
changeset that was pushe
This change fixes two problems related to usage of soft references in javadoc.
The one in `VisibleMemberTable` is rather trivial, it just avoids getting the
softly referenced value twice, which allowed GC to clear the reference between
the two calls.
For the one in `CommentHelper`, I consider
