Integrated: 8216497: javadoc should auto-link to platform classes

2020-10-07 Thread Hannes Wallnöfer
his pull request has now been integrated. Changeset: 1e8e543b Author: Hannes Wallnöfer URL: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/commit/1e8e543b Stats: 1844 lines in 51 files changed: 1831 ins; 4 del; 9 mod 8216497: javadoc should auto-link to platform classes Co-authored-by: Jan Lahoda Reviewed-by: erikj, jjg - PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/171

Re: RFR: 8216497: javadoc should auto-link to platform classes [v4]

2020-10-07 Thread Hannes Wallnöfer
ink option plus minor cleanup - Merge pull request #1 from lahodaj/JDK-8216497 Automatically generate the elements-list data from the ct.sym for releases 11+, including the current release under development - Generating current release list for javadoc; using hardcoded lists for versions

Re: RFR: 8216497: javadoc should auto-link to platform classes [v3]

2020-09-23 Thread Jonathan Gibbons
On Wed, 23 Sep 2020 14:20:12 GMT, Hannes Wallnöfer wrote: >> This pull request is identical with the RFR previously sent for the >> Mercurial repository: >> >> https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/javadoc-dev/2020-August/001796.html >> >> I'm copy-pasting the comments from the original RFR

Re: RFR: 8216497: javadoc should auto-link to platform classes [v3]

2020-09-23 Thread Hannes Wallnöfer
> This pull request is identical with the RFR previously sent for the Mercurial > repository: > > https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/javadoc-dev/2020-August/001796.html > > I'm copy-pasting the comments from the original RFR below. > > Most of the new code is added to the Extern class wher

Re: RFR: 8216497: javadoc should auto-link to platform classes [v2]

2020-09-23 Thread Hannes Wallnoefer
Switching to reply by email to javadoc-dev only in order to not spam all the other mailing lists with each comment/reply. > Am 22.09.2020 um 19:37 schrieb Jonathan Gibbons : > > src/jdk.javadoc/share/classes/jdk/javadoc/internal/doclets/formats/html/resources/standard.properties > line 350: >

Re: RFR: 8216497: javadoc should auto-link to platform classes [v2]

2020-09-23 Thread Hannes Wallnöfer
On Tue, 22 Sep 2020 17:30:19 GMT, Jonathan Gibbons wrote: >> Hannes Wallnöfer has updated the pull request incrementally with three >> additional commits since the last revision: >> >> - Merge pull request #1 from lahodaj/JDK-8216497 >> >>Automatically generate the elements-list data f

Re: RFR: 8216497: javadoc should auto-link to platform classes [v2]

2020-09-22 Thread Jonathan Gibbons
On Mon, 21 Sep 2020 10:47:40 GMT, Hannes Wallnöfer wrote: >> This pull request is identical with the RFR previously sent for the >> Mercurial repository: >> >> https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/javadoc-dev/2020-August/001796.html >> >> I'm copy-pasting the comments from the original RFR

Re: RFR: 8216497: javadoc should auto-link to platform classes [v2]

2020-09-22 Thread Jonathan Gibbons
On Tue, 22 Sep 2020 17:24:19 GMT, Jonathan Gibbons wrote: >> Hannes Wallnöfer has updated the pull request incrementally with three >> additional commits since the last revision: >> >> - Merge pull request #1 from lahodaj/JDK-8216497 >> >>Automatically generate the elements-list data f

Re: RFR: 8216497: javadoc should auto-link to platform classes [v2]

2020-09-21 Thread Hannes Wallnöfer
> This pull request is identical with the RFR previously sent for the Mercurial > repository: > > https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/javadoc-dev/2020-August/001796.html > > I'm copy-pasting the comments from the original RFR below. > > Most of the new code is added to the Extern class wher

Re: RFR: 8216497: javadoc should auto-link to platform classes

2020-09-15 Thread Hannes Wallnöfer
On Tue, 15 Sep 2020 12:56:13 GMT, Erik Joelsson wrote: >> This pull request is identical with the RFR previously sent for the >> Mercurial repository: >> >> https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/javadoc-dev/2020-August/001796.html >> >> I'm copy-pasting the comments from the original RFR bel

Re: RFR: 8216497: javadoc should auto-link to platform classes

2020-09-15 Thread Erik Joelsson
On Tue, 15 Sep 2020 09:10:54 GMT, Hannes Wallnöfer wrote: > This pull request is identical with the RFR previously sent for the Mercurial > repository: > > https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/javadoc-dev/2020-August/001796.html > > I'm copy-pasting the comments from the original RFR below.

Re: RFR: 8216497: javadoc should auto-link to platform classes

2020-09-15 Thread Hannes Wallnöfer
On Tue, 15 Sep 2020 11:30:09 GMT, Jan Lahoda wrote: >> This pull request is identical with the RFR previously sent for the >> Mercurial repository: >> >> https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/javadoc-dev/2020-August/001796.html >> >> I'm copy-pasting the comments from the original RFR below.

Re: RFR: 8216497: javadoc should auto-link to platform classes

2020-09-15 Thread Jan Lahoda
On Tue, 15 Sep 2020 09:10:54 GMT, Hannes Wallnöfer wrote: > This pull request is identical with the RFR previously sent for the Mercurial > repository: > > https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/javadoc-dev/2020-August/001796.html > > I'm copy-pasting the comments from the original RFR below.

RFR: 8216497: javadoc should auto-link to platform classes

2020-09-15 Thread Hannes Wallnöfer
hould auto-link to platform classes Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/171/files Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jdk&pr=171&range=00 Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8216497 Stats: 3230 lines in 53 files changed: 3220 ins; 4 del; 6 mod

RFR: 8216497: javadoc should auto-link to platform classes

2020-08-20 Thread Hannes Wallnoefer
Please review: JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8216497 Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~hannesw/8216497/webrev.00/ CSR: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8251181 Most of the new code is added to the Extern class where it fits in quite nicely and can use the existing suppo

Auto-link to platform classes

2020-07-26 Thread Robert Scholte
Hi, for the maven-javadoc-plugin we're getting several requests related to linking to most recent JDK classes. Currently we need update this inside the plugin, so people always need to wait for a new release of the plugin (or manually configure to the right source, but most won't do that). Ther