Ok, so are these three items I mentioned bugs in the original implementation?
And I should report each of them separately and try to fix them in the original
implementation, right?
Or should I propose my patch (or part of it) as a fix for them (with tests ofc)?
Michael Simacek
On 09/23/2013 05:36 AM, Michael Simacek wrote:
Thank you for your help, Jon.
I've rewritten it a bit (also had to change the Util.executableMembersEqual
method to fix some issues),
so now all the tests should pass and I have fixed some other bugs.
Now the order of classes is the same and order
On 09/23/2013 05:36 AM, Michael Simacek wrote:
Thank you for your help, Jon.
I've rewritten it a bit (also had to change the Util.executableMembersEqual
method to fix some issues),
so now all the tests should pass and I have fixed some other bugs.
Now the order of classes is the same and order
Thank you for your help, Jon.
I've rewritten it a bit (also had to change the Util.executableMembersEqual
method to fix some issues),
so now all the tests should pass and I have fixed some other bugs.
Now the order of classes is the same and order of interfaces is mostly the same.
I tried to get
On 09/19/2013 10:46 AM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
-- does the change affect the generated docs.
... and the answer is "yes". :-)
The order of some parts of the generated docs differs before/after the
patch. This is an issue which needs to be fixed.
At first, I thought it was due to the use
On 09/19/2013 10:46 AM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
There are two criteria for a change like this:
-- the obvious one -- do all the javadoc regression tests pass. These
are the tests
langtools/test/com/sun/javadoc
langtools/test/tools/javadoc
Two regression tests fail when the patch is
On 09/19/2013 11:02 AM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
On 09/19/2013 10:00 AM, Michael Simacek wrote:
Hi,
I thought about improving performance of the default doclet
implementation a bit.
According to profiler results, most of the CPU time is spent in
constructing the member map in VisibleMemberMap.
On 09/19/2013 10:00 AM, Michael Simacek wrote:
Hi,
I thought about improving performance of the default doclet implementation a
bit.
According to profiler results, most of the CPU time is spent in constructing
the member map in VisibleMemberMap.java.
So I've rewritten part of the VisbleMemberM
On 09/19/2013 10:00 AM, Michael Simacek wrote:
Is there any chance of this patch (attached) being accepted into OpenJDK?
I've never made any contribution to OpenJDK before, so I would like to ask for
code review and guidance through the contribution process.
Michael
For reference, the general
On 09/19/2013 10:00 AM, Michael Simacek wrote:
Hi,
I thought about improving performance of the default doclet implementation a
bit.
According to profiler results, most of the CPU time is spent in constructing
the member map in VisibleMemberMap.java.
So I've rewritten part of the VisbleMemberM
10 matches
Mail list logo
