Hi,
(If this is the wrong alias for this review, sorry for the email. Please
let me know which alias I should send to.)
Please review a fix for
JDK-8032526
fix the accessibility, html, syntax errors and warnings reported by
doclint report in langtools
webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~cl
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 1:56 AM, Zhong Yu wrote:
> I had a comment here:
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2013-July/019308.html
>
> Regarding strict HTML 4.01 compliance - majority of people don't care.
> If javadoc takes a moral stand on this issue, a lot of people will be
>
Hi Jon,
I've been looking for the options I could use with -Xdoclint, but without
success.
Whereas the javac -help -X gives compressed list of options, the javadoc
is missing it.
How can I get the complete list of options?
thanks,
Robert Scholte
Op Tue, 14 Jan 2014 21:06:23 +0100 schreef
I had a comment here:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2013-July/019308.html
Regarding strict HTML 4.01 compliance - majority of people don't care.
If javadoc takes a moral stand on this issue, a lot of people will be
annoyed and angry. That's in the best interest of javadoc as
Christine,
Have you tried doing a docs build and looking at the output. These lines
stand out as being probably wrong:
91 {@code
92 import com.sun.javadoc.*;
93
94 public class ListParams extendsDoclet {
Having HTML inside a "{@code" section means that the HTML will be
rendered lit
