On Fri, 14 Jun 2024 02:32:16 GMT, Nizar Benalla wrote:
>> Nizar Benalla has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> whitespace
>
> src/jdk.javadoc/share/classes/jdk/javadoc/internal/doclint/Checker.java line
> 695:
>
>> 693:
On Fri, 14 Jun 2024 19:16:26 GMT, Nizar Benalla wrote:
>> Can I please get a review for this change, that aims to add support for
>> Global HTML tags.
>> Here is the
>> [link](https://cr.openjdk.org/~nbenalla/javadocGlobalPR/pkg1/package-summary.html)
>> to the generated docs.
>> Thanks in adv
On Tue, 18 Jun 2024 11:12:41 GMT, SendaoYan wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This pull request contains a backport of commit
> [472b935b](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/472b935b442f7f925b665c7de91eda77f3dcbe8b)
> from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
>
> The commit being
On Tue, 18 Jun 2024 11:12:41 GMT, SendaoYan wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This pull request contains a backport of commit
> [472b935b](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/472b935b442f7f925b665c7de91eda77f3dcbe8b)
> from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
>
> The commit being
On Tue, 18 Jun 2024 11:12:41 GMT, SendaoYan wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This pull request contains a backport of commit
> [472b935b](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/472b935b442f7f925b665c7de91eda77f3dcbe8b)
> from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
>
> The commit being
On Tue, 18 Jun 2024 11:12:41 GMT, SendaoYan wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This pull request contains a backport of commit
> [472b935b](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/472b935b442f7f925b665c7de91eda77f3dcbe8b)
> from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
>
> The commit being
Hi all,
This pull request contains a backport of commit
[472b935b](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/472b935b442f7f925b665c7de91eda77f3dcbe8b)
from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
The commit being backported was authored by SendaoYan on 18 Jun 2024 and was
review
On Tue, 18 Jun 2024 07:43:23 GMT, SendaoYan wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> Test
>> `test/langtools/jdk/javadoc/doclet/testIOException/TestIOException.java` run
>> fails with root user privileged. I think it's necessary to skip this
>> testcase when user is root.
>> Why run the jtreg test by root use
On Sat, 15 Jun 2024 09:07:04 GMT, SendaoYan wrote:
> Hi all,
> Test
> `test/langtools/jdk/javadoc/doclet/testIOException/TestIOException.java` run
> fails with root user privileged. I think it's necessary to skip this testcase
> when user is root.
> Why run the jtreg test by root user? It'
On Tue, 18 Jun 2024 07:43:23 GMT, SendaoYan wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> Test
>> `test/langtools/jdk/javadoc/doclet/testIOException/TestIOException.java` run
>> fails with root user privileged. I think it's necessary to skip this
>> testcase when user is root.
>> Why run the jtreg test by root use
On Tue, 18 Jun 2024 07:43:23 GMT, SendaoYan wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> Test
>> `test/langtools/jdk/javadoc/doclet/testIOException/TestIOException.java` run
>> fails with root user privileged. I think it's necessary to skip this
>> testcase when user is root.
>> Why run the jtreg test by root use
On Tue, 18 Jun 2024 07:43:23 GMT, SendaoYan wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> Test
>> `test/langtools/jdk/javadoc/doclet/testIOException/TestIOException.java` run
>> fails with root user privileged. I think it's necessary to skip this
>> testcase when user is root.
>> Why run the jtreg test by root use
On Tue, 18 Jun 2024 08:32:43 GMT, Pavel Rappo wrote:
> > Does the `throw new Error(f + ": " + message);` should be replaced to
> > `throw new SkippedException(f + ": " + message);`, to avoid report failure
> > if a directory cannot be made read-only.
>
> Yes, it does! That's the whole point. I
On Tue, 18 Jun 2024 01:26:33 GMT, SendaoYan wrote:
> Does the `throw new Error(f + ": " + message);` should be replaced to `throw
> new SkippedException(f + ": " + message);`, to avoid report failure if a
> directory cannot be made read-only.
Yes, it does! That's the whole point. Ironically, I
> Hi all,
> Test
> `test/langtools/jdk/javadoc/doclet/testIOException/TestIOException.java` run
> fails with root user privileged. I think it's necessary to skip this testcase
> when user is root.
> Why run the jtreg test by root user? It's because during rpmbuild process
> for linux distri
15 matches
Mail list logo
