On Wed, 4 Sep 2024 18:39:15 GMT, Nizar Benalla wrote:
>> Can I please get a review for this PR that adds 4 new html "Checkers" for
>> the generated documentation.
>> More details are in the JBS issues
>>
>> These tests were mostly inspired /converted from the existing
>> [Doccheck](https://git
> Can I please get a review for this PR that adds 4 new html "Checkers" for the
> generated documentation.
> More details are in the JBS issues
>
> These tests were mostly inspired /converted from the existing
> [Doccheck](https://github.com/openjdk/doccheck).
Nizar Benalla has updated the pull
> Can I please get a review for this PR that adds 4 new html "Checkers" for the
> generated documentation.
> More details are in the JBS issues
>
> These tests were mostly inspired /converted from the existing
> [Doccheck](https://github.com/openjdk/doccheck).
Nizar Benalla has updated the pull
> Please review an update to "clean up" the direct use of HtmlTree constructors.
>
> Hitherto, many/most instances of `HtmlTree` were created by static factory
> methods. This update extends that convention.
> In most cases, this is by providing either simple no-arg factory methods or
> commonl
On Tue, 3 Sep 2024 20:31:34 GMT, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
>> Please review an update to "clean up" the direct use of HtmlTree
>> constructors.
>>
>> Hitherto, many/most instances of `HtmlTree` were created by static factory
>> methods. This update extends that convention.
>> In most cases, thi
