Re: RFR: 8298405: Implement JEP 467: Markdown Documentation Comments [v56]

2024-05-07 Thread Joe Darcy
On Wed, 1 May 2024 20:40:00 GMT, Jonathan Gibbons wrote: > > There should be some quick testing of the new default method on Elements > > using the VacuousElements implementation; see > > `test/langtools/tools/javac/processing/model/util/elements` for some > > examples. > > @jddarcy I've reor

Re: RFR: 8298405: Implement JEP 467: Markdown Documentation Comments [v56]

2024-05-01 Thread Jonathan Gibbons
On Fri, 12 Apr 2024 17:39:11 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote: > There should be some quick testing of the new default method on Elements > using the VacuousElements implementation; see > `test/langtools/tools/javac/processing/model/util/elements` for some examples. @jddarcy I've reorganized the tests in

Re: RFR: 8298405: Implement JEP 467: Markdown Documentation Comments [v56]

2024-04-12 Thread Joe Darcy
On Thu, 11 Apr 2024 17:52:14 GMT, Jonathan Gibbons wrote: >> Please review a patch to add support for Markdown syntax in documentation >> comments, as described in the associated JEP. >> >> Notable features: >> >> * support for `///` documentation comments in `JavaTokenizer` >> * new module `j

Re: RFR: 8298405: Implement JEP 467: Markdown Documentation Comments [v56]

2024-04-11 Thread Jonathan Gibbons
> Please review a patch to add support for Markdown syntax in documentation > comments, as described in the associated JEP. > > Notable features: > > * support for `///` documentation comments in `JavaTokenizer` > * new module `jdk.internal.md` -- a private copy of the `commonmark-java` > libra