On Thu, 4 Apr 2024 21:21:58 GMT, Pavel Rappo wrote:
>> src/jdk.javadoc/share/classes/jdk/javadoc/internal/doclets/formats/html/ConstructorWriter.java
>> line 200:
>>
>>> 198: content.add(heading);
>>> 199: return HtmlTree.SECTION(HtmlStyle.detail, content)
>>> 200:
On Thu, 4 Apr 2024 21:52:20 GMT, Pavel Rappo wrote:
>> If you use `forMember` on an `ExecutableElement` whose enclosing element is
>> an annotation type interface, you know there cannot be any type parameters.
>
> Right, but some accommodation/special-casing for annotations will be there
>
On Thu, 4 Apr 2024 21:31:03 GMT, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
>> True, type parameters are not an issue for annotation interface methods,
>> which [are not allowed to have any parameters][], type or otherwise.
>> However, the code that prints annotations for method signatures does not
>> know that
On Thu, 4 Apr 2024 21:20:19 GMT, Pavel Rappo wrote:
>> src/jdk.javadoc/share/classes/jdk/javadoc/internal/doclets/formats/html/HtmlIds.java
>> line 567:
>>
>>> 565: var methods =
>>> vmt.getVisibleMembers(VisibleMemberTable.Kind.METHODS);
>>> 566: // for whatever reason
On Thu, 4 Apr 2024 18:52:42 GMT, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
>> Pavel Rappo has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Respond to feedback
>
>
On Thu, 4 Apr 2024 12:28:23 GMT, Pavel Rappo wrote:
>> Creating a link to a constructor or a method or comparing constructors or
>> methods __does not__ factor in type parameters. When constructors or methods
>> are overloaded and differ only in type parameters -- a situation which is
>>
> Creating a link to a constructor or a method or comparing constructors or
> methods __does not__ factor in type parameters. When constructors or methods
> are overloaded and differ only in type parameters -- a situation which is
> absent in JDK API, but present elsewhere -- that causes
