On Fri, 5 Apr 2024 19:58:27 GMT, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
> > Does this make sense?
>
> While I am dubious about 3-tuples, your explanation makes enough sense that I
> accept your reply. Thanks for the explanation.
Yet another alternative notation, should we come up with one in the future.
Whi
On Fri, 5 Apr 2024 19:47:40 GMT, Pavel Rappo wrote:
> Does this make sense?
While I am dubious about 3-tuples, your explanation makes enough sense that I
accept your reply. Thanks for the explanation.
-
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18519#issuecomment-2040539618
On Fri, 5 Apr 2024 17:52:25 GMT, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
> Approved, with two optional suggestions. Both could be considered style
> suggestions.
>
> ## 1
> (Minor) While I like the new multi-valued return for
> `forMember(ExecutableElement executable)` I'm slightly surprised at the use
> of
On Fri, 5 Apr 2024 15:03:36 GMT, Pavel Rappo wrote:
>> Creating a link to a constructor or a method or comparing constructors or
>> methods __does not__ factor in type parameters. When constructors or methods
>> are overloaded and differ only in type parameters -- a situation which is
>> absen
> Creating a link to a constructor or a method or comparing constructors or
> methods __does not__ factor in type parameters. When constructors or methods
> are overloaded and differ only in type parameters -- a situation which is
> absent in JDK API, but present elsewhere -- that causes signifi
