[The Java Posse] Re: moreBrowsers() == better?

2008-09-09 Thread Nathan
That is the correct way to render a pseudo-class per CSS rules. You're seeing the application of :focus which isn't required to reflow the box elements of the page. So it sounds like Chrome is doing it correctly. On Sep 9, 3:48 pm, Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Has anyone else noticed that C

[The Java Posse] Re: moreBrowsers() == better?

2008-09-09 Thread Jack
Has anyone else noticed that Chrome doesn't render Google.com quite right? I know I'm nitpicking here, but if you select the Google search box, it displays, like Safari, a faint orange halo around the text box. But because the "Search" and "I'm feeling Lucky" buttons are touching the text box bel

[The Java Posse] Re: Java 6 update 10 - Chrome - OSX?

2008-09-09 Thread Mark Derricutt
You did that as well huh? I did email feedback asking about that. As you say - they're all Mac using people on the show, and they talk of running 'the latest stuff from engineering' now and then... On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 9:44 PM, sherod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I also sent listener feedba

[The Java Posse] Re: Mac Widgets for Java

2008-09-09 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
@Andres: Glad to hear your following the blog...more widgets soon! @BoD: I'm not using any native calls...this is pure Java Graphics 2D and component customization. Thus, it looks pretty much identical on Windows (minor differences include fonts and spacing). I decided early on that this was the

[The Java Posse] Re: Granularity when accessing POJOs

2008-09-09 Thread Casper Bang
Hmm looks a lot like Martin Fowlers "dynamic properties" and one wonder if this isn't just another workaround for missing the real thing in the language. Type safety seems to suffer in much the same way demonstrated by annotations, turning entities into "a big bag of stuff". Also it would not app

[The Java Posse] Granularity when accessing POJOs

2008-09-09 Thread kd
Hi all, I Just spotted the following article on UJO framework (http:// www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=50604) and wondered others felt of this coarse style access to POJO versus the common JavaBean style access to POJO attributes ? I must admit, when I scanned it, I found myself mu

[The Java Posse] Re: Netbeans - Project dependencies

2008-09-09 Thread Rob Wilson
[bump] ;-) --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to javaposse@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For mo

[The Java Posse] Re: Java 6 update 10 - Chrome - OSX?

2008-09-09 Thread sherod
Did anybody hear that thud? It sounded like a lead apple wrapped in an NDA. Dirk?.. Dirk!? Anyway, interestingly the 6 update 7 that is on developer access fixes one of my biggest Netbeans issues: AWT/Swing windows don't work with Spaces I also sent listener feedback about Java/Apple to

[The Java Posse] Re: Mac Widgets for Java

2008-09-09 Thread BoD
Just out of curiosity, is this using native calls? If not, what does it look like on windows? BoD [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > In case anyone's interested, I just released "Mac Widgets for > Java" (announced here with screen shots: http://explodingpixels.wordpress.com/ > ), which you can find on

[The Java Posse] Re: Java 6 update 10 - Chrome - OSX?

2008-09-09 Thread Dirk Jäckel
On 09.09.2008, at 03:50, Mark Volkmann wrote: Can you tell us if Apple will ever provide Java 6 for 32-bit Macs? It is in the Snow Leopard Preview. Oops! :-) Regards, Dirk PGP.sig Description: This is a digitally signed message part