I had some initial trouble with the browser plugin on WinXP, but it
seems to have worked itself out after a couple reinstalls.
Manfred Moser wrote:
> On Saturday October 18 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> Java 6 Update 10 is out... However I've only seen a brief post on
>> java.net
>>
>> I
On Saturday October 18 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Java 6 Update 10 is out... However I've only seen a brief post on
> java.net
>
> I imagine Sun is probably saving themselves for the launch of
> JavaFX but I didn't expect to hear the crickets chriping.
No kidding. I thought there be some ma
Java 6 Update 10 is out... However I've only seen a brief post on
java.net
I imagine Sun is probably saving themselves for the launch of JavaFX
but I didn't expect to hear the crickets chriping.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscr
You can't enforce one of the two with no way to go for either. That's
just not feasible. Think about it; it would be impossible to write
even the simplest utility methods.
Just like in generics, where you can specify: Don't care what it is
('T extends Object', it should be possible to say: Don't
See also the dev mailing list
http://markmail.org/search/dev%40jackpot%2Enetbeans%2Eorg?page=1
Patrick
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The
Java Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to ja
See http://markmail.org/message/wueinuku3isk655r from late last year
on the status.
Basically, Jackpot was used as the underpinnings for Java refactoring
as of NetBeans 6.0. The code should all be there, but I believe it's
not being maintained as an independent project anymore, although one
shoul
