Each copy of IntelliJ bonds with its owner on startup (That's the
intelli bit),
When bonding it adopts the owners way of being and outlook on life.
Thus, some copies are stable, some flaky, and in my case, some refuse
to start.
:o)
On Feb 11, 1:45 pm, Christian Catchpole
wrote:
> Hey it is in
Hey it is intellij. Perhaps it re-factored and healed itself. :)
PS. I love intellij and haven't had any problems with 8.0.1 (so far).
On Feb 11, 12:21 pm, Van Riper wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 4:21 PM, Michael Neale
> wrote:
>
> > Is anyone else mortified by the lack of stability in I
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 4:21 PM, Michael Neale wrote:
>
> Is anyone else mortified by the lack of stability in IntelliJ 8.0.1 ?
> (yes even the point release) or is it just me?
It's just you. ;-)
It has been very stable and much snappier loading my projects.
Cheers, Van
--
| Michael "Van" Ri
Oddly I'm finding it rather stable here - but then I'm not touching any JSPs
or the like.
Is it IDEA itself or more plugin issues?
...and then Buffy staked Edward. The End.
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Michael Neale wrote:
>
> Is anyone else mortified by the lack of stability in IntelliJ
Is anyone else mortified by the lack of stability in IntelliJ 8.0.1 ?
(yes even the point release) or is it just me?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The
Java Posse" group.
To post to this group, send
Generally positive review:
http://www.infoworld.com/article/09/02/09/06TC-javafx_1.html
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The
Java Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to javaposse@googleg
[REMINDER][ANN] JAVAWUG BOF 45 :: QCon Special - Building Twitter with
Grails in 40 Minutes
Hi All
JAVAWUG is please to announce BOF 45 ``JAVAWUG BOF 45 QCon Special -
Repeat Session - Building Twitter with Grails in 40 Minutes'' with
Graeme Rocher of SpringSource. This very special event will b
There's 'synthetic', which is a flag on class members that indicates
that they aren't intentional (by the code author), just a side-effect
of the compiler making it all work right. A side-effect is that most
IDEs suppress them in auto-complete models, which is overkill, but
another flag that means
Hey Reinier,
thanks for your very very long answer. Again a lot of things are more
clear to me and I also agree in many points with you.
Still there is a point that I have to clarify. When I say that we want
to develop for a mobile platform, it does not mean that we want to
hack it or program lo
Scala doesn't work that way because Tuples have O(1) access to all
elements where what you propose would have O(n) access. Having 22
Tuple classes is definitely a code smell. Same with having 22
Function classes. But those are code smells forced by the JVM. On
"machines" with a less strict sta
Why would it be good for a Tuple to be a List?
~~ Robert.
Reinier Zwitserloot wrote:
> Even if you use a list instead of a tuple, lists don't support
> heterogenous typing; you can have a tuple of type ,
> but you can't have a list that is defined to contain alternating
> String/Integer. I agree
As your third paragraph states, if you're grabbing the Nth element out of an
N-tuple that way,
you're doing something wrong. Probably confusing "tuple" with "list".
In some other languages, a method that takes a tuple transparently unpacks the
tuple into local
variables, so accessing the Nth
Even if you use a list instead of a tuple, lists don't support
heterogenous typing; you can have a tuple of type ,
but you can't have a list that is defined to contain alternating
String/Integer. I agree that it would be great if somehow the actual
underlying object is the same thing between a tup
That was a joke.
On Feb 10, 5:00 am, Christian Catchpole
wrote:
> This link cliams..
>
> 22 is the number of partitions of 8, and 8 is the largest cube in the
> Fibonacci sequence, and the Fibonacci sequence is the most popular FP
> example.
>
> http://www.nabble.com/Why-tuples-only-to-22--td199
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 12:34 AM, Michael Neale wrote:
>
> So how would you do it in scala ;) ?
*laugh*
Well, the Scalaposse isn't really broadcasting yet ;)
>
>
> (sorry I always find it crushing how easy everything is in scala, when
> I have to look at java).
>
> Of course you can just do:
15 matches
Mail list logo
