On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 11:46:01 -0800 (PST), Paul Wallace
wrote:
>
> At work we are trying to put together an in-house training programme
> for IT staff with basic programming knowledge who want to become
> developers, specifically Java developers.
Head First Java and some of the other related Hea
I think its quite cute really. Its exactly how kids think - what would
interest the person they are talking to that also interests them. Face
painted does not interest them, so its a no go, but turtles - well
everyone likes them.
I also appreciate Carl's pronunciation as accurate to that video.
Yeah. When interviewed later he said that he was thought the
interviewer might be interested in his turtles. And being nervous,
that's what came out. Something like that.. Or he was on crack, I
can't remember.
On Feb 25, 12:21 pm, Michael Neale wrote:
> Often on The Java Technology (tm) Poss
Often on The Java Technology (tm) Posse, Carl uses the quote "I like
turtles":
Is that from this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CMNry4PE93Y
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The
Java Posse" group.
To
All,
In the latest podcast (Feb 21?) I believe Tor made a statement of surprise
that OSGi released a distributed reference implementation (Apache CXF).
Shortly there after, I was talking to someone who is using OSGi as an
out-and-out replacement for EJB. I wanted to spark a discussion based on
wh
On Feb 24, 9:26 pm, Reinier Zwitserloot wrote:
> A tonne of libraries out there will all of a sudden break when the new
> java8 (or whatever) is released with new methods on java.util.List,
> because they mistakenly specified compatibility with 7+. There's no
> way to test for this, certainly n
On Feb 24, 12:26 pm, Reinier Zwitserloot wrote:
> Right, so you agree that there are situations where a module must ask
> specifically for List[1..7] and cannot just go for [1..*]. I contend
> that these situations are sufficiently common that there's going to be
> a LOT of headache with incompat
Glad I entertained a few of you :) Please feel free to forward
around! Position still open!
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The
Java Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to javaposse@goog
In my own code I do something similar to what DBUtils does -- borrowing a
page from the Grails domain object design. I put the mapping between the
fields and the table columns in a Map within the bean. This allows me to
explicitly state the mapping between the two -- or rather explicitly state
th
id second thinking in java and also the head first series
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Paul Wallace
wrote:
>
> At work we are trying to put together an in-house training programme
> for IT staff with basic programming knowledge who want to become
> developers, specifically Java developers.
>
DBUtils code look like this:
QueryRunner run = new QueryRunner(dataSource);
ResultSetHandler h = new BeanHandler(Person.class);
Person p = (Person) run.query("SELECT * FROM Person WHERE name=?",
"John Doe", h);
(Which implictly calls the public no arguments constructor of People
and some sette
Looks Scala-esque (in the positive sense)
So basically the code block is executed once and the very last expression
will be "returned"?
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 9:22 PM, Reinier Zwitserloot wrote:
>
> Via twitter:
>
> http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=ddb3zt39_77cgxvktgs&hl=en
>
> I like it, mostly.
Hi Guys,
I'm facing a situation here. The app server I'm using for testing apps
in IDE (a flavour of Eclipse) runs into some kind of conflict with the
SUN JRE installed in Windows XP SP2. The result is the app server
would hang with CPU running at 100%. Anyhow, to work around that
particular issu
Right, so you agree that there are situations where a module must ask
specifically for List[1..7] and cannot just go for [1..*]. I contend
that these situations are sufficiently common that there's going to be
a LOT of headache with incompatible modules, if this happens.
You also won't get any er
Via twitter:
http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=ddb3zt39_77cgxvktgs&hl=en
I like it, mostly. Less magic as with the BGGA proposal (where the
final semi-colon or lack thereof decides between a void or a non-void
return type), and far less impact.
Incidentally, my forthcoming unifiying closure proposa
Well you have created one a little unnessisarily. Anything that
depends on the exact class type may break. Class names get ugly etc.
I don't mind the technique but these are some of the minor side
effects.
On Feb 24, 10:42 pm, Marcelo Morales
wrote:
> I am curious. Why do you think an anonymo
At work we are trying to put together an in-house training programme
for IT staff with basic programming knowledge who want to become
developers, specifically Java developers.
Can anyone recommend a good tutorial based Java book for beginners
that will not only teach Java but emphasis good softwa
I hope this is the codename for the upcoming Chinese JME 5 KVM.
On Feb 24, 7:27 pm, Joshua Marinacci wrote:
> Ancient Kung-fu Magic (tm)
>
> On Feb 24, 2009, at 9:19 AM, mbien wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hello,
>
> > I am curious. JavaFX bytecode makes heavy use of annotations, many
> > javafx RT classes a
Long live Kwai Chang Caine.
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 2:27 PM, Joshua Marinacci wrote:
>
> Ancient Kung-fu Magic (tm)
>
> On Feb 24, 2009, at 9:19 AM, mbien wrote:
>
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am curious. JavaFX bytecode makes heavy use of annotations, many
>> javafx RT classes also use enums and generi
Ancient Kung-fu Magic (tm)
On Feb 24, 2009, at 9:19 AM, mbien wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I am curious. JavaFX bytecode makes heavy use of annotations, many
> javafx RT classes also use enums and generics. How should this run on
> a 1.4 J2ME KVM?
>
> regards,
>
> michael
>
>
> On Feb 24, 5:41 am, Dere
Hello,
I am curious. JavaFX bytecode makes heavy use of annotations, many
javafx RT classes also use enums and generics. How should this run on
a 1.4 J2ME KVM?
regards,
michael
On Feb 24, 5:41 am, Derek Munneke wrote:
> Just to make sure that everyone is on the same page, the JavaME platform
On Feb 24, 6:15 am, Reinier Zwitserloot wrote:
> Nope, if you want version 7 of List, you can't even use version 9 of
> List, because version 9 of List declares 'filter', which you can't
> work with. The module system does not,as far as I can tell, allow you
> to make the distinction: "I'm just u
Hi Christian,
You might want to have a look at Apache Commons DBUtils which uses similar
syntax to convert resultsets into beans using a the BeanProcessor class.
Hope this helps,
Mark
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 6:21 AM, Christian Hvid wrote:
>
> Hi Java people.
>
> I have been toying with simplier
On Feb 10, 12:02 am, Ido wrote:
> Does anyone is working in production with something like that?
The "data collection engine" underneath Hyperic is SIGAR (http://
www.hyperic.com/products/sigar.html) which is dual-licensed under GPL
and a commercial license. It has a Java API, so it may be wort
Dear Ido,
>
> I've been working in the past with Nagios but lately, I was wondering
> if there is a
> similar (pure) Java application for that.
> Does anyone is working in production with something like that?
>
I'm curious why you want a pure Java solution?
I used Zabbix in the past, I even wrot
Somebody likes the javafx syntax :)
(Which, really, is understandable. Say what you want, javafx script is
gobsmackingly elegant, especially for GUI programming).
On Feb 23, 6:12 pm, Viktor Klang wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 11:23 PM, Christian Catchpole <
>
> christ...@catchpole.net> wrote
Nope, if you want version 7 of List, you can't even use version 9 of
List, because version 9 of List declares 'filter', which you can't
work with. The module system does not,as far as I can tell, allow you
to make the distinction: "I'm just using these" and "I'm extending
list, and therefore you c
Jorge Ortiz, Christos Loverdos and myself have a slumbering Scala
Improvement Proposal to include what you call "extension methods" to Scala
code.
We've experimented with different syntax and it depends on how you want it
to work.
I was pulling toward a more "type selector" based mechanism like t
I am curious. Why do you think an anonymous inner class is a drawback?
Marcelo
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Peter Becker wrote:
>
> I quite like the instance initializers, too. The only drawback is that
> they create anonymous inner classes every time you use one, but
> considering the adva
Peter Becker wrote:
>>> nces of it are immutable since subclasses might break that
>>> assumption.
>>>
>>>
>> and that is the responsibility of the sub-class, not my mother!
>>
>>
>>
> My problem is that I am too pessimistic to believe that people will be
> happy with me tel
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 1:45 AM, Peter Becker wrote:
>
> kirk wrote:
> > Peter Becker wrote:
> >
> >> kirk wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> Peter Becker wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> kirk wrote:
>
>
>
>
> > tackl...@googlemail.com wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >>
kirk wrote:
> Peter Becker wrote:
>
>> kirk wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Peter Becker wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
kirk wrote:
> tackl...@googlemail.com wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>> On Feb 17
I quite like the instance initializers, too. The only drawback is that
they create anonymous inner classes every time you use one, but
considering the advantages of better encapsulation and nice scoping of
the construction block I think the extra $n classes are a small price to
pay.
Peter
Vik
33 matches
Mail list logo
