Does ANY successor to Java use virtual by default? Not C#, nor Scala
nor Fan. How about JavaFX?
/Casper
On 14 Mar., 13:21, Marcelo Morales
wrote:
> All right, my question has been answered. Thank you.
> Someone said it can be acomplished today. Anybody knows of something?.
> Now that I think ab
Hi all,
I've been thinking lately that I'd like to try out collection-style closures
in Java, albeit as best as we can do with inner-classes. What I'd like to
end up is generic versions of Map & List that are exactly the same, but *
also* have methods like list.forEach(...), list.filter(),
lis
Maybe http://functionaljava.org/ has what you want?
BR,
John
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Matthew Kerle wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've been thinking lately that I'd like to try out collection-style closures
> in Java, albeit as best as we can do with inner-classes. What I'd like to
> end up is g
commons-collections worked for me in the past. The Closure, Predicate,
and Transform interfaces where eye-openers like six or seven years
ago.
Today, commons-collections are Workable, but un-generified. There is a
generified branch but might mess dependencies when using third party
software like h
I have listened to a couple of the sped up podcasts and am loving
them. This is the only way for me to listen now.
Thanks, Justin
On Feb 26, 12:45 am, Reinier Zwitserloot wrote:
> Steven (Herod) and I finished our sped up posse project.
>
> Starting at episode #229, you can get your javaposse
"the Google Collections API doesn't seem to have much closure-y goodness
either."Strange to me. The Function and Predicate of google collections are
quite good for me.
Looking at
http://google-collections.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/javadoc/com/google/common/collect/Iterables.html
it provides much mor
Note to posse: Feel free to take your time and speak 20% slower. :)
On Mar 16, 5:22 am, Justin wrote:
> I have listened to a couple of the sped up podcasts and am loving
> them. This is the only way for me to listen now.
>
> Thanks, Justin
>
> On Feb 26, 12:45 am, Reinier Zwitserloot wrote:
>
Nearly 40 lightning talks from the roundup'09 are now up on YouTube on
our channel:
http://www.youtube.com/user/javaposse
Most should be in HD by now, so happy viewing!
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Gr
JavaFX has an "override" key word and you -must- specify it in order
to override a method - which means that all methods are implicitly
@NotOverriding otherwise.
-- Tor
On Mar 15, 7:24 am, Casper Bang wrote:
> Does ANY successor to Java use virtual by default? Not C#, nor Scala
> nor Fan. How
What do you mean "virtual by default"? Isn't every java method on a class
that implements an interface "virtual"?
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Casper Bang wrote:
>
> Does ANY successor to Java use virtual by default? Not C#, nor Scala
> nor Fan. How about JavaFX?
>
> /Casper
>
> On 14 Mar.
I agree. Although after listening for a while it seems like they've
all had too much coffee.
Kudos to Reinier and Steven.
On Mar 15, 12:22 pm, Justin wrote:
> I have listened to a couple of the sped up podcasts and am loving
> them. This is the only way for me to listen now.
>
> Thanks, Justi
For me, after a while everybody sounds normal.
Just like my 30″ monitor looks medium sized to me now.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The
Java Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to java
Thank you!
I know to appreciate the bandwidth of the work and line on this
one... ;)
On Mar 15, 8:20 pm, carl wrote:
> Nearly 40 lightning talks from the roundup'09 are now up on YouTube on
> our channel:
>
> http://www.youtube.com/user/javaposse
>
> Most should be in HD by now, so happy viewi
And I saw them automatically download in Miro earlier - tonight is
crap tv night so its posse night ;-)
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 4:20 PM, carl wrote:
>
> http://www.youtube.com/user/javaposse
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscri
14 matches
Mail list logo
