would be a pity to see zfs and dtrace dissappear - the linux guys can't
put into their kernel - need some space tourist to adopt opensolairs and
become it's SABDF ;)
Joe Data wrote:
> On Mar 19, 12:29 am, Steven Herod wrote:
>
>> Do you see the possibility that Solaris could supplant Linux
that's one of my concerns too - I love the stuff ! I'm even going to teach
it. Let's hope it won't feel like teaching latin - a dead language. ;-)
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 6:45 PM, Ruben Reusser wrote:
>
> Personally, I am wondering what it will do to JavaFX - it would be a
> shame to loose it. I
The main issues I have with IBM:- They always proved that their product line
don't take developer productivity has an input. Developers time is a big
revenue stream for IBM global services and others and so they have negative
incentive to actually reduce our suffering :(
- Sun has the worst sales d
On Mar 19, 12:29 am, Steven Herod wrote:
> Do you see the possibility that Solaris could supplant Linux in the
> IBM suite?
I don't know. For all the talk by Sun about the fabulous Solaris
uptake in the market, it sure doesn't make a lot of money: $42 million
in the last quarter, -29% year-to-y
Personally, I am wondering what it will do to JavaFX - it would be a
shame to loose it. It's just out there and IBM would have to commit to
the same path that Sun had in mind for it.
Ruben
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 3:56 AM, Steven Herod wrote:
>
> http://online.wsj.com/article/SB12373597080626792
For what I am concerned, I would consider this a very sad thought...
I've known Java from the days it started and I've always associated Sun with
it. If Sun would be bought, I think Java won't be Java any more. It will
have been 'assimilated' by some commercial entity, just for the sake of
profits
On Mar 18, 4:43 pm, James Ward wrote:
> Just be glad it's not Microsoft. :)
mmm Java#.Net 2.0. I can just see it now.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The
Java Posse" group.
To post to this group,
I'm sure Sun execs told employees it was a focus thing and told them to
be focused.
Meanwhile they focused on selling the farm...
Joe Data wrote:
> On Mar 18, 6:56 am, Steven Herod wrote:
>
>> http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123735970806267921.html
>>
>> Personally, it's probably good for 'J
Joe Data wrote:
>> Power vs Sparc
>>
> No idea what would happen here.
>
IBM is trying to avoid buying the hardware division according to most
articles I've read. Fujitsu might buy this slice of Sun, for instance.
>> Lotus Symphony vs OpenOffice
>>
> Wrong: Lotus Symphony is "Eclipse
Peter Becker wrote:
> Eclipse used to be impressive, but nowadays I get the impression IBM has
> no real interest in making it a decent Java IDE anymore.
Eclipse methodology:
Step 1: Capture market share
Step 2: Let free products languish or simply keep it from providing a
full solution and prod
Eclipse used to be impressive, but nowadays I get the impression IBM has
no real interest in making it a decent Java IDE anymore. Compared to
NetBeans it still wins hands down in anything related to code hygiene
(NetBeans doesn't even bother to properly format the code it generates)
and it is
11 matches
Mail list logo
