Casper Bang wrote:
I'd exclude Microsoft, but sure, that's the fun category. :)
Fun for people who don't use it, you mean? :-)
--
Fabrizio Giudici - Java Architect, Project Manager
Tidalwave s.a.s. - "We make Java work. Everywhere."
java.net/blog/fabriziogiudici - www.tidalwave.it/people
fa
> I wouldn't call their CPU business more conservative than similar
> businesses. Their research group is definitely not legacy or
> conservative. It's bleeding edge and is considered among the best of
> private industry research. They have large consulting groups which are
> very sales/business or
I'm curious. How do you judge that IBM is "primarily servicing
conservative and legacy systems"?
I wouldn't call their CPU business more conservative than similar
businesses. Their research group is definitely not legacy or
conservative. It's bleeding edge and is considered among the best of
priva
A better measurement would be based on the number of users. How many of them
have more than say 100,000 users or even just 25,000 users. I'm not sure the
number, but the good apps will be popular and I wonder how many of their
140,000 are used by a lot of people?
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 12:19 PM,
On Jan 26, 1:35 pm, Casper Bang wrote:
> I pretty much agree with that analysis, just wanted to point out that
> Android Marked went from 20.000 to 25.000 over the last month or
> so:http://www.androidguys.com/2010/01/23/unofficial-count-android-market...
Apple now claims 140,000 apps in the sto
Wildam Martin wrote:
It looks more like they are going to combine it really not just making
it a side track. It seems it is getting an alltogether huge event. -
My fear is: Will the infrastructure at the location be capable of
managing that huge amount of people? ;-)
It's up to Moscone's pe
On Jan 28, 1:21 pm, "fabrizio.giud...@tidalwave.it"
wrote:
> Well, "making NetBeans the best IDE for JSE, JEE, JME and
> JavaFX" doesn't seem to be pushed to the web corner too much
> ;-) What NetBeans is losing focus about is JRuby and support
> for other dynamic languages; but the IDE stays open
That was kind of expected, especially given their focus on hardware -
Oracle already makes huge money by delivering non-cloud software (and
I believe Larry famously said the cloud is dead). Ironically, I think
we're finally moving into the age appropriate for Sun's old moniker
"the network is the c
> First of all, this is very positive news for the Sun
> employees since most of them will keep their job. Where
> the products overlap, the Sun stuff (Glassfish, Netbeans,
> MySQL) seems to be pushed into the "web corner" with the
> Oracle Stuff (Weblogic, JDeveloper, Oracle DB) firmly
> remainin
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 12:18, Karsten Silz wrote:
> I am now convinced that being taken over by Oracle was better for Sun
> than being taken over by IBM and HP and is better for the industry as
> a whole
Yep, I think so too - even if I do not feel of really having much insight.
--
Martin Wilda
On Jan 28, 5:11 am, "pub...@lesstroud.com"
wrote:
> They are killing, at least, one project. Kenai is dead. See the FAQ
> on OTN.
First of all, this is very positive news for the Sun employees since
most of them will keep their job. Where the products overlap, the Sun
stuff (Glassfish, Netbean
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 08:09, kirk wrote:
> J1 appears to be dead... but it will be treated as a separate part of OW.
> Which sort of looks like it's not dead. I'm not sure of all of the thinking
> behind the decision to move but I bet that much of it was... the EU stalled
> long enough that we s
I didn't watch (so far) the primary announcement, but only a few of
those (the Java and Open Office related)
Oracle webcasts
http://www.oracle.com/events/productstrategy/index.html
and not the main presentation of Larry (didn't notice a link to that) and...
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 19:56, pub...@l
13 matches
Mail list logo
