Re: [The Java Posse] Re: Good gosh J7 lambdas/closures are looking worse by the day

2010-05-31 Thread Josh McDonald
Agreed, I'm far more interested in the JVM having a standard "function" type and invocation semantics than the syntax within Java source. On 1 June 2010 15:12, Michael Neale wrote: > I think it shows it in its worst light, when others show examples it > is OK I guess... > > I guess I am more int

[The Java Posse] Re: Good gosh J7 lambdas/closures are looking worse by the day

2010-05-31 Thread Michael Neale
I think it shows it in its worst light, when others show examples it is OK I guess... I guess I am more interested in the semantics given that other languages are far more useful to me (and interesting as well) thus interop matters if this will be used in JDK apis. Otherwise it is really hard to c

Re: [The Java Posse] Good gosh J7 lambdas/closures are looking worse by the day

2010-05-31 Thread Josh McDonald
Ew, this reeks of "making the compiler-writer's job easy". There must be a nicer solution, even within the narrow guidelines of the problem. Even Obj-C's blocks are nicer than this (in Syntax at least). On 31 May 2010 15:58, Michael Neale wrote: > > http://www.baptiste-wicht.com/2010/05/oracle-p

[The Java Posse] Re: Dropbox alternative Joe mentioned in 309?

2010-05-31 Thread Carl
Thank you Mikael. You are quite right; apparently I was not listening very carefully. For the record I am very happy with Dropbox but I thought if there was an alternative that others liked, it would be worth taking a look. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google G

Re: [The Java Posse] Dropbox alternative Joe mentioned in 309?

2010-05-31 Thread Mikael Sundberg
http://avatron.com/apps/air-sharing/ but i think its just an alternative to the dropbox app on iphone/ipad, not the service dropbox. /Micke 2010/5/31 Carl > I am guessing the name is right in front of me in the show notes but I > don't see. > > Air something

[The Java Posse] Dropbox alternative Joe mentioned in 309?

2010-05-31 Thread Carl
I am guessing the name is right in front of me in the show notes but I don't see. Air something? TIA, Carl -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to javapo...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from t

RE: [The Java Posse] Re: Good gosh J7 lambdas/closures are looking worse by the day

2010-05-31 Thread Roel Spilker
> Closures can also be assigned to SAM types. A SAM type is any type that is > (1) abstract and > (2) has only one undefined method in it. > In other words, any interface that mentions only 1 method, and any abstract > class where all > but 1 method has an implementation. Like FileFilter and R

[The Java Posse] Re: Good gosh J7 lambdas/closures are looking worse by the day

2010-05-31 Thread Casper Bang
Wow that's ugly. Source code obfuscaters are going to have a blast. On May 31, 7:58 am, Michael Neale wrote: > http://www.baptiste-wicht.com/2010/05/oracle-pushes-a-first-version-o... > > I guess most of the attention has been on the semantics (and rightly > so) but wow... just wow. > > (sorry to

[The Java Posse] Re: Good gosh J7 lambdas/closures are looking worse by the day

2010-05-31 Thread Reinier Zwitserloot
Here's a very short rundown on the official syntax, with a link to the last known proposal at the end. The current status quo isn't, as far as I know, 100% the same as the 'official' proposal, because a new version of the spec hasn't been released in months. There's also been an encyclopedia's wort