Ew, this reeks of "making the compiler-writer's job easy". There must be a
nicer solution, even within the narrow guidelines of the problem. Even
Obj-C's blocks are nicer than this (in Syntax at least).
On 31 May 2010 15:58, Michael Neale wrote:
>
> http://www.baptiste-wicht.com/2010/05/oracle-p
On Sun, 2010-05-30 at 22:58 -0700, Michael Neale wrote:
> http://www.baptiste-wicht.com/2010/05/oracle-pushes-a-first-version-of-closures/comment-page-1/#comment-2023
>
> I guess most of the attention has been on the semantics (and rightly
> so) but wow... just wow.
>
> (sorry to interupt the app
I really don't like the look of them. If they'd reused { } around the
actual method call I'd be much happier. But reusing ()?
--
Pull me down under...
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 5:58 PM, Michael Neale wrote:
>
> http://www.baptiste-wicht.com/2010/05/oracle-pushes-a-first-version-of-closures
http://www.baptiste-wicht.com/2010/05/oracle-pushes-a-first-version-of-closures/comment-page-1/#comment-2023
I guess most of the attention has been on the semantics (and rightly
so) but wow... just wow.
(sorry to interupt the appleposse with java news).
--
You received this message because you
