Hey Matthew
We were in beta for the last six months and in the exit phase
currently.
We are slowly letting people in for our trial to provide better
support.
Please sign up here if you are interested.
http://www.architexa.com/
Thanks
On May 11, 11:30 pm, Matthew Kerle wrote:
> do you have a b
[Seems like we hit a moderator block somehow... Apologies for the
repost. -Vineet]
Hey Matthew,
We were in beta for the last six months and currently are in exit
phase.
Architexa Suite is available for trial and we are slowly letting in
people in to provide proper support.
I would suggest you to
do you have a beta available for trial?
On 12 May 2010 11:05, Vineet wrote:
> Exactly, UML tools need to be more useful when you already have code.
> I find it a pity that not many people are talking about their needs
> for better tools, and as a result we do not get the benefit of having
> tool
Exactly, UML tools need to be more useful when you already have code.
I find it a pity that not many people are talking about their needs
for better tools, and as a result we do not get the benefit of having
tools meet these needs.
Christian, I know you haven't used our tool - but if you are
inter
The think I like most about tools like this is the ability to visualize what
is already there. I won't use it that often to write code, but for
understanding the code base, learning how things are organized, and
following an execution path; this is what these kinds of tools are good for.
On Tue,
In principle, I agree that taking a design -> code approach is going
to work in an agile environment far less conveniently than a code ->
design approach. Beyond that I can't say. I haven't used your tool.
Personally I do prefer to document as/after the fact, not up-front.
Christian.
On
Christian,
Glad you like it.
Good point about sales. I am really not worrying too much about that
right now. I just want to make sure that people find it useful.
As for the different take: we are taking a reverse-engineering based
approach as opposed to the more popular design based approaches. A
So - nothing against your offering, which seems pretty nice... but
it's not a "different take". Generating diagrams from code, reverse/
forward engineering such diagrams, and round-trip stuff has been
around since the mid-to-late 90's, and some of it was in decent form
at the time, as well.
Wasn't Together Control Center acquired by Borland, and what is not
part of their core? I talked to some ex-Borland folk, and my
understanding is that what got them popular was this reverse
engineering engineering support to something useful that they had
added.
Regardless, here is perhaps the que
