Actually there are ways to define a platform portable library (which
will ultimately need to address the GUI too) and then statically link
in just the code that is used by a particular application (which is
the approach Go is taking). The resulting app is self contained.
This can be done in such
2009/11/15 Casper Bang
>
> I hear you, and might I add, WebStart is no rosy story either in a
> customer scenario. Personally I have always felt that the client Java
> approach is a case of "doing all platforms, but none of them
> particular well". I suppose there's direct evidence to that, in ho
I hear you, and might I add, WebStart is no rosy story either in a
customer scenario. Personally I have always felt that the client Java
approach is a case of "doing all platforms, but none of them
particular well". I suppose there's direct evidence to that, in how
NetBeans for Windows is delivere
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 7:18 PM, Moandji Ezana wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 6:37 PM, Robert Casto wrote:
>
>> See what you get when you let engineers design logos!
>
>
> From the article at the beginning of the thread: "Gordon, the Go gopher
> mascot, drawn by Rob Pike's wife and illustrator
Very good article
> Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 19:47:30 -0800
> Subject: [The Java Posse] Re: Google hopes to remake programming with Go
> From: steven.he...@gmail.com
> To: javaposse@googlegroups.com
>
>
> I came across this, ALGOL-68
>
> http://lua-users.org/l
I came across this, ALGOL-68
http://lua-users.org/lists/lua-l/2009-11/msg00576.html
Another reminder to me to cease any interest in a language based
purely on its language constructs.
For me, end user functionality is more important (its libraries,
frameworks etc).
On Nov 14, 6:22 am, Robert
I still think 'grex' is right though.
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Moandji Ezana wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 6:37 PM, Robert Casto wrote:
>
>> See what you get when you let engineers design logos!
>
>
> From the article at the beginning of the thread: "Gordon, the Go gopher
> mascot, dr
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 6:37 PM, Robert Casto wrote:
> See what you get when you let engineers design logos!
>From the article at the beginning of the thread: "Gordon, the Go gopher
mascot, drawn by Rob Pike's wife and illustrator Renee French."
Moandji
--~--~-~--~~~---
See what you get when you let engineers design logos!
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 12:34 PM, grex wrote:
>
>
>
> On Nov 11, 1:34 pm, Steven Herod wrote:
>
> > Personally I look forward to a day when the industry doesn't stand
> > around Google like a toilet training toddler, applauding and cheering
>
On Nov 11, 1:34 pm, Steven Herod wrote:
> Personally I look forward to a day when the industry doesn't stand
> around Google like a toilet training toddler, applauding and cheering
> every time something gets 'delivered'.
Well, you gotta admin that the Go mascot looks a bit like a little
turd
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 4:34 PM, Steven Herod wrote:
>
> Personally I look forward to a day when the industry doesn't stand
> around Google like a toilet training toddler, applauding and cheering
> every time something gets 'delivered'.
>
Agreed. But if Google is going to do something, I would mu
You are right, lack of toilet training never held Michael Neale back,
I should get him straight into something simple, like JBoss Rules.
On Nov 12, 10:11 am, Reinier Zwitserloot wrote:
> Uh, go DOESN'T run on the JVM. Does it?
>
> Steven: You *AREN'T* teaching your kid to design programming
> la
Uh, go DOESN'T run on the JVM. Does it?
Steven: You *AREN'T* teaching your kid to design programming
languages? Geez. *Some* parents take their kid growing up intelligent
and multi-lingual seriously. You lazy git, wasting time with potty
training instead.
On Nov 11, 10:56 pm, Casper Bang wrote
And I look forward to the day where something isn't amazing just
because it runs on the JVM - we're all different I guess.
/Casper
On Nov 11, 10:34 pm, Steven Herod wrote:
> There is probably a relationship between the name being difficult to
> search for and the fact they didn't find the earli
There is probably a relationship between the name being difficult to
search for and the fact they didn't find the earlier language. :o)
Personally I look forward to a day when the industry doesn't stand
around Google like a toilet training toddler, applauding and cheering
every time something ge
>From what I hear I'm guessing go is designed as a replacement for C.
As in, for situations where you'd currently use C and not java or
python. So, kernels and device drivers. Given that google is doing the
chrome OS thing, and given that it's the authors of unix of all things
that are behind this
Casper Bang wrote:
> Not nearly as interesting as Fan. However, gofmt is probably handy in
> the toolchain of large organizations - to prevent Tor from using
> space instead of tab. :)
>
> /Casper
LOL. Apart from Casper's comment, for me go seems to be a big yawn.
--
Fabrizio Giudici - Java
Not nearly as interesting as Fan. However, gofmt is probably handy in
the toolchain of large organizations - to prevent Tor from using space
instead of tab. :)
/Casper
On Nov 11, 5:03 am, Kerry Sainsbury wrote:
> I went "meh": I don't want to return to a world without exceptions, and
> having t
I went "meh": I don't want to return to a world without exceptions, and
having to check return values everywhere.
I don't fancy going back to a world of * and & either.
... but then I'm a simple man with simple needs. I'm sure larger minds than
mine may find something of interest here.
Cheers
Ke
Not had a good look at it yet, but the defer'd expressions look rather
awesome.
--
Pull me down under...
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 2:20 PM, CKoerner wrote:
> Thoughts, opinions from the Java crowd?
>
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are
20 matches
Mail list logo
