> If the courts rule in favour of Oracle, what are the implications for
> other companies using Java source code;http://harmony.apache.orgfor
> example.
If Sun had issues with granting Harmony status as Java, then certainly
so does Oracle. Furthermore, as Android uses the Harmony class
library, it
Given the topic of the thread, I did not think it was clear... I made it
so.
I gave a couple of examples and I could think of more things oracle could
explain...
/derek
On 13 Aug 2010 14:27, "Robert Casto" wrote:
> This is a thread titled "Oracle - please explain?".
>
> What else would I be ta
Moreover Java has beneficed public contribution over the years. It's morally
repulsive to claim - today - the absolute and complete ownership of
something like Java and conveniently forget about the public. Even if you do
own patents xyz.
But then again, some people got away that way already in th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8/13/10 10:12 , Tom Meech wrote:
> I'm staggered by this move by Oracle. I've always thought that
> android complements Java, so that success of Java and Android is a
> benefits to Google and Oracle.
As a community, we always think of moral benefit
I'm staggered by this move by Oracle. I've always thought that android
complements Java, so that success of Java and Android is a benefits to
Google and Oracle.
I'm a little confused about how Oracle can make claim about infringing
IP, with the Java code under the GPL license. My limited understan
> It will be fun, if google now come up with their own jvm
> implementation ;)
Ummm they have, it's called Dalvik and it's at the heart of these
patent claims!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The
Java Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email
t will be fun, if google now come up with their own jvm
implementation ;)
On Aug 13, 9:07 am, Casper Bang wrote:
> It's almost as if Larry is looking for a way to get his extra expenses
> covered, and looks back at what Sun did to Microsoft to get $ 1.6bn.
> Though Google had the benefits of hi
It's almost as if Larry is looking for a way to get his extra expenses
covered, and looks back at what Sun did to Microsoft to get $ 1.6bn.
Though Google had the benefits of hindsight and most noticeably did
NOT refer to Java anywhere - avoiding the copyright violation aspect.
/Casper
On Aug 13,
Amen...
Not that I was expecting it, but I'm not exactly surprised either. It Sadly
fits with the mindset of my former employer: one-track minded, on the short
term money making machines.
But honestly, I would have kept the surprise for the keynote @ JavaOne ! :-)
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 06:57,
This is a thread titled "Oracle - please explain?".
What else would I be talking about?
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 12:51 AM, Derek Munneke wrote:
> So i guess you are talking about the Google law suit
>
> http://www.scribd.com/doc/35811761/Oracle-s-complaint-against-Google-for-Java-patent-infringem
So i guess you are talking about the Google law suit
http://www.scribd.com/doc/35811761/Oracle-s-complaint-against-Google-for-Java-patent-infringement
.. which i guess is because now there is money to take up the issues from
2007:
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13580_3-9817048-39.html
http://news.cnet.
Makes me want to distance myself from them totally. Unfortunately, I need to
make a living and right now that is developing on Android. Oracle has
crossed the line on this one.
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 12:26 AM, Michael Neale wrote:
> Oracle pissing all over the java brand and community by doing t
Oracle pissing all over the java brand and community by doing this.
Killing it as a safe choice in the mind share of developers to build
on.
What a message "build on java, but watch out for these patents if you
get to successful".
On Aug 13, 1:21 pm, Derek Munneke wrote:
> remind me, what are
13 matches
Mail list logo
