On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 5:04 AM, Ricky Clarkson
wrote:
> Perhaps it's because I'm not actually signed up to many mailing lists,
> but personally I don't find the lack of branching in gmail a problem.
> I very quickly scroll past the uninteresting posts, like I do in
> google reader and twitter. I
Perhaps it's because I'm not actually signed up to many mailing lists,
but personally I don't find the lack of branching in gmail a problem.
I very quickly scroll past the uninteresting posts, like I do in
google reader and twitter. I honestly thought most people were like
me in that regard, but t
Wave can do this!
Oh... wait...
On 20 October 2010 22:15, Josh Berry wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 5:10 PM, Christopher Rued wrote:
>
>>
>> I don't think Gmail, or even Google groups, support this for some
>> reason...
>>
>
> You are correct. :( This is sad, as I really don't want to
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 5:10 PM, Christopher Rued wrote:
>
> I don't think Gmail, or even Google groups, support this for some reason...
>
You are correct. :( This is sad, as I really don't want to switch out of
gmail just for the groups stuff.
Ah well, I guess I can be one of the ones that st
On 10/20/2010 4:54 PM, Josh Berry wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 4:54 PM, Josh Berry wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 4:39 PM, Christopher Rued wrote:
>>> Thunderbird shows these messages as threaded (very nice).
>> I believe he meant with branches.
> Or does that mean I should jump over
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 4:54 PM, Josh Berry wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 4:39 PM, Christopher Rued wrote:
>> Thunderbird shows these messages as threaded (very nice).
>
> I believe he meant with branches.
Or does that mean I should jump over to thunderbird instead of gmail? :(
--
Yo
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 4:39 PM, Christopher Rued wrote:
> Thunderbird shows these messages as threaded (very nice).
I believe he meant with branches.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The
Java Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to java
Thunderbird shows these messages as threaded (very nice).
On 10/20/2010 4:25 PM, Casper Bang wrote:
> Staying on topic can be hard. I suspect Google deemed threads too
> complicated, but I actually miss the old days of usenet where a
> discussion could fork and you could let it be if it was of no
Staying on topic can be hard. I suspect Google deemed threads too
complicated, but I actually miss the old days of usenet where a
discussion could fork and you could let it be if it was of no interest
to you. Some forums have moderators to detach OT stuff, but since this
group is largely unmoderate
On 10/20/10 18:42 , CKoerner wrote:
Ah I thought you meant subject as in how you titled a post. What you
are describing is staying 'on topic' within a thread.
How about when we see that a sub-topic is of interest that someone
makes a quick call to create a new thread on said subject and move
tha
Ah I thought you meant subject as in how you titled a post. What you
are describing is staying 'on topic' within a thread.
How about when we see that a sub-topic is of interest that someone
makes a quick call to create a new thread on said subject and move
that talk to it.
--
You received this m
11 matches
Mail list logo
