Well they only took a subset (some 2,514 classes for Android 2.1), the
stuff that made sense! Contrast that with the modern JRE (some 17,378
classes for JDK6).
On Sep 28, 12:59 pm, Miroslav Pokorny
wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Casper Bang wrote:
> > Because forking means you are req
Why does anyone re-write anything?
On Sep 28, 2:46 pm, Miroslav Pokorny
wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 2:37 PM, Steven Herod wrote:
>
> > So... who wants to speculate on Google starting their own, ground up
> > toolchain solution for GWT / Android / etc that is NOT based on
> > Eclipse or Netbe
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Casper Bang wrote:
> Because forking means you are required to drag along the gigantic tail
> of legacy. I respect Google for having the guts to reboot the whole
> thing occasionally, it's pragmatic. However I doubt they will be doing
> their own IDE from scratch,
Early yesterday evening I felt what I thought was a small earth tremor
but on catching up with Twitter I realised it coincided with Tor
putting out his third ever tweet :-))
On Sep 28, 3:24 am, Christian Catchpole
wrote:
> I stand by my idea of re-tweeting the original in new and interesting
> wa
Because forking means you are required to drag along the gigantic tail
of legacy. I respect Google for having the guts to reboot the whole
thing occasionally, it's pragmatic. However I doubt they will be doing
their own IDE from scratch, not initially anyway.
On Sep 28, 6:46 am, Miroslav Pokorny
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 2:37 PM, Steven Herod wrote:
> So... who wants to speculate on Google starting their own, ground up
> toolchain solution for GWT / Android / etc that is NOT based on
> Eclipse or Netbeans
>
>
Why would anyone want to start from scratch when licensing is not a problem
if
So... who wants to speculate on Google starting their own, ground up
toolchain solution for GWT / Android / etc that is NOT based on
Eclipse or Netbeans
On Sep 28, 12:24 pm, Christian Catchpole
wrote:
> I stand by my idea of re-tweeting the original in new and interesting
> ways...
>
> http
I stand by my idea of re-tweeting the original in new and interesting
ways...
http://twitpic.com/2842nx
On Sep 28, 6:44 am, Chris Adamson wrote:
> Even more shockingly, his two tweets in the last few days has gotten
> his average twitter period under one tweet per year.
>
> http://twitter.com/to
Even more shockingly, his two tweets in the last few days has gotten
his average twitter period under one tweet per year.
http://twitter.com/tornorbye
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The
Java Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to javapo
Congrats Tor!!
On Sep 27, 10:46 am, CKoerner wrote:
> Torgle
>
> http://tornorbye.blogspot.com/2010/09/next-chapter.html
>
> Shame he didn't get in at Netflix, or Facebook (pre-ipo stock for the
> win).
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The
Java Pos
10 matches
Mail list logo
