I did not intend to say the exercise was too hard.
I was not ranting.
I was merely pointing out that Exercise #2 seemed incomplete and that
there was a bad zip file.
On Feb 9, 4:11 am, abhishek shukla wrote:
> me too agree with you all ,This exercise is very hard to do .It should be
> introduce
me too agree with you all ,This exercise is very hard to do .It should be
introduced after swing
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to javaprogrammingwithpassion@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
javaprogrammingwit
I completely agree. I had a similar experience while working on this exercise.
Thanks,
Ameeth
--- On Sun, 2/8/09, Maldoror wrote:
From: Maldoror
Subject: [java programming] Re: JavaBeans Excersize 2
To: "Free Java Programming Online Training Course By Sang Shin"
Date: Sunday,
Not a rant, I hope, but constructive criticism...
I do feel there is an issue about where the Java Beans lesson comes in
the course. Having covered relatively straightforward techniques, the
student is suddenly introduced to a complex architecture involving
more advanced O-O techniques such as in
On Feb 8, 3:49 am, "Harry Hartley" wrote:
> I have worked my way through the code of Exercise 2 of the JavaBeans Labs. I
> am not clear what the purpose of this lab is, or what is being demonstrated.
> What was the intent of exercise 2 of the JavaBeans lab?
>
> http://www.javapassion.com/handso
