On Mon, 8 Aug 2005, Charles Chen wrote:
> I also found that if I set the length of the queue[] to 50 instead of 2, no
> data missing is seen in my 2-second long recording. But it is certainly not a
> good work around.
50 may be overkill, but why do you think increasing the queue size is "not
a
On Tue, 14 Jan 2003, Brad BARCLAY wrote:
>On Tue, 14 Jan 2003 19:13:44 -0500 (EST), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>Hey Dan:
>
>>perhaps all exceptions in javax.usb should be prefixed with 'Usb'...
>
> That's not such a bad idea. If a developer is working with
>another developers code, it can
On a related note to the (Usb)NotActiveException discussion, the
control-type UsbIrp is currently called ControlUsbIrp; but a suggestion
was made to rename it to UsbControlIrp. This keeps consistency of the Usb
prefix. While we're at it though, let's review all the names:
UsbHub
UsbPort
UsbD
On Tue, 14 Jan 2003, Brad BARCLAY wrote:
>On Tue, 14 Jan 2003 13:31:03 -0500 (EST), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> It would be best to have something in javax.usb., but with a
>different name (perhaps USBNotActiveException). This is for two
>reasons:
>
> 1) As some users will want to u
One of the known todos is to create more meaningful USB-specific
UsbExceptions. While talking to a coworker, we discussed what to do about
platform-specific errors, i.e. those that aren't USB-specific. We came up
with
PlatformException extends UsbException
{
public Exception getException();
In regard to the new irp offset and length settings, I was orignally
thinking that the default settings should be the most common - I'm always
for that. For the offset, the most common setting is 0, so that's ok, but
for the length, the most common setting will be the data.length. So, I
was
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Roger Lindsjo wrote:
>On Sat, 11 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 11 Jan 2003, Roger Lindsjo wrote:
>>
>After looking some more at the specs I realized that some methods actually
>use Hungarian Notation (i -> Index, bcd -> BCS, id -> ID) but sometimes b
>is u
On Sat, 11 Jan 2003, Roger Lindsjo wrote:
>I'm not to fond of setting the variable storage type (not variable type)
>in front of the methods. Hungarian notation at least tells what type of
>value the variable holds. But I see your point of following the PSecs
>notation.
My feeling is, as long
