Re: [javax-usb-devel] 0.10 implementation

2003-01-13 Thread ddstreet
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Roger Lindsjo wrote: >On Sat, 11 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> On Sat, 11 Jan 2003, Roger Lindsjo wrote: >> >After looking some more at the specs I realized that some methods actually >use Hungarian Notation (i -> Index, bcd -> BCS, id -> ID) but sometimes b >is u

Re: [javax-usb-devel] 0.10 implementation

2003-01-12 Thread Roger Lindsjo
On Sat, 11 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Sat, 11 Jan 2003, Roger Lindsjo wrote: > > >I'm not to fond of setting the variable storage type (not variable type) > >in front of the methods. Hungarian notation at least tells what type of > >value the variable holds. But I see your point of

Re: [javax-usb-devel] 0.10 implementation

2003-01-11 Thread ddstreet
On Sat, 11 Jan 2003, Roger Lindsjo wrote: >I'm not to fond of setting the variable storage type (not variable type) >in front of the methods. Hungarian notation at least tells what type of >value the variable holds. But I see your point of following the PSecs >notation. My feeling is, as long

Re: [javax-usb-devel] 0.10 implementation

2003-01-11 Thread Roger Lindsjo
On Wed, 8 Jan 2003, Dan Streetman wrote: > > Ok, the 0.10 API, common RI, and Linux RI (which are all in CVS only) > are essentially working at a beta level. The UsbView (swing) app is > updated for the new API methods (mainly offset/length and using > ControlUsbIrps instead of Requests). The J

[javax-usb-devel] 0.10 implementation

2003-01-08 Thread Dan Streetman
Ok, the 0.10 API, common RI, and Linux RI (which are all in CVS only) are essentially working at a beta level. The UsbView (swing) app is updated for the new API methods (mainly offset/length and using ControlUsbIrps instead of Requests). The JavaDOC is linked to from the main page (http://javax