On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 4:57 PM, Jason Kastner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
is the b0_5 branch where all the latest changes reside? Curious what the
JAXME-28 branch represents?
The latest version is the trunk. The JAXME-28 branch was used in the
past for developments related to
(FSH)
Sent: Friday, December 29, 2006 11:35 AM
To: Robert Eric Reeves
Cc: jaxme-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: RE: Question about pattern/enumeration constraint from Sheng
Good morning Rob,
Thanks a lot for the quick reply again. Actually I have also tried
xsd:string but the same problem persists.
I
Good morning,
I am trying JAXME 0.5.2 and I can run some examples as well as create
some simple programs.
However, I have problem with creating a constraint to only allow integer
5 and 8 as the status. It seems that pattern and enumeration are not
working.
xsd:simpleType
That does look like a bug to me.
A work around until it's fixed might be to use enumeration. In fact, I
would recommend that because it's easier to read -- at least for me...
xsd:simpleType name=StatusType
xsd:restriction base=xsd:positiveInteger
: Question about pattern/enumeration constraint from Sheng
That does look like a bug to me.
A work around until it's fixed might be to use enumeration. In fact, I
would recommend that because it's easier to read -- at least for me...
xsd:simpleType name=StatusType
xsd:restriction
: Robert Eric Reeves [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 29, 2006 10:56 AM
To: Huang, Sheng (FSH)
Cc: jaxme-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: Question about pattern/enumeration constraint from Sheng
That does look like a bug to me.
A work around until it's fixed might be to use enumeration
-
From: Robert Eric Reeves [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 29, 2006 11:14 AM
To: Huang, Sheng (FSH)
Cc: jaxme-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: Question about pattern/enumeration constraint from Sheng
Yep, I've got enumeration working throughout my XSD. Maybe there is
another bug
in the implClass
attribute (and replaces our classes).
My question: Is this the expected behavior of JaxMe (or I'm doing
something wrong)?
Best Regards
MM
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail
On 11/24/05, Michail Michailow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
we are using sun's JAXB extension jaxb:class
implClass=com.company.project.ClassName
to force the ObjectFactory of the sun's JAXB implementation to create
instances of
_our_ classes during unmarshalling process (as described here
