cvs commit: ws-jaxme status.xml

2005-08-04 Thread jochen
jochen 2005/08/04 14:33:15 Modified:src/xs/org/apache/ws/jaxme/xs/junit JiraTest.java src/jaxme/org/apache/ws/jaxme/junit JiraTest.java src/xs/org/apache/ws/jaxme/xs/impl XSTypeImpl.java ant js.xml .status.xml

cvs commit: ws-jaxme status.xml

2005-07-30 Thread jochen
jochen 2005/07/30 14:11:50 Modified:.Tag: v0_4 status.xml Log: An IllegalStateException was thrown, if a facet violation was detected in the Unmarshaller. This is now changed to a proper ValidationEvent. PR: JAXME-62 Revision ChangesPath No

cvs commit: ws-jaxme status.xml

2005-07-30 Thread jochen
jochen 2005/07/30 14:12:00 Modified:.Tag: JAXME-28 status.xml Log: An IllegalStateException was thrown, if a facet violation was detected in the Unmarshaller. This is now changed to a proper ValidationEvent. PR: JAXME-62 Revision ChangesPath No

cvs commit: ws-jaxme status.xml

2005-07-30 Thread jochen
jochen 2005/07/30 14:12:10 Modified:.status.xml Log: An IllegalStateException was thrown, if a facet violation was detected in the Unmarshaller. This is now changed to a proper ValidationEvent. PR: JAXME-62 Revision ChangesPath 1.68 +9 -3

cvs commit: ws-jaxme status.xml

2005-07-27 Thread jochen
jochen 2005/07/27 12:46:12 Modified:src/js/org/apache/ws/jaxme/js Tag: JAXME-28 JavaSource.java .Tag: JAXME-28 status.xml Log: The method JavaSource.newBeanProperty() was mismatching void and boolean when checking for isFoo vs. getFoo. Submitted by:

cvs commit: ws-jaxme status.xml

2005-07-19 Thread jochen
jochen 2005/07/19 12:35:45 Modified:src/js/org/apache/ws/jaxme/js Tag: JAXME-28 JavaSource.java .Tag: JAXME-28 status.xml Log: Added JavaSource.getConstructor(JavaQName[]). Submitted by: Frederic Ahring, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Revision ChangesPath No

cvs commit: ws-jaxme status.xml

2005-07-19 Thread jochen
jochen 2005/07/19 14:02:00 Modified:.status.xml Log: A sequence was always treated as required, even if all particles were optional. Revision ChangesPath 1.64 +4 -0 ws-jaxme/status.xml Index: status.xml

cvs commit: ws-jaxme status.xml

2005-07-19 Thread jochen
jochen 2005/07/19 14:02:47 Modified:src/jaxme/org/apache/ws/jaxme/generator/sg/impl/ccsg Tag: v0_4 GroupHandlerSG.java .Tag: v0_4 status.xml Log: A sequence was always treated as required, even if all particles were optional.

cvs commit: ws-jaxme status.xml

2005-07-19 Thread jochen
jochen 2005/07/19 14:03:17 Modified:.Tag: JAXME-28 status.xml Log: A sequence was always treated as required, even if all particles were optional. Revision ChangesPath No revision No revision 1.61.2.3 +4 -0

cvs commit: ws-jaxme status.xml

2005-07-08 Thread jochen
jochen 2005/07/08 07:45:17 Modified:src/js/org/apache/ws/jaxme/js/util Tag: v0_4 JavaParser.java .Tag: v0_4 status.xml Log: The JavaParser didn't handle multidimensional arrays properly. Submitted by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Revision ChangesPath No

cvs commit: ws-jaxme status.xml

2005-07-04 Thread jochen
jochen 2005/07/04 17:01:08 Modified:.Tag: v0_4 status.xml Log: Use of xs:extension is now mapped to proper Java inheritance (at least for the bean classes.) Revision ChangesPath No revision No revision 1.45.2.10 +6 -0

cvs commit: ws-jaxme status.xml build.xml

2005-05-20 Thread jochen
jochen 2005/05/19 23:58:59 Modified:src/xs/org/apache/ws/jaxme/xs/junit Tag: v0_4 ParserTest.java src/documentation/content/xdocs Tag: v0_4 news.xml site.xml .Tag: v0_4 status.xml build.xml Log: Prepared 0.4 final.

Re: cvs commit: ws-jaxme status.xml build.xml

2005-05-20 Thread Nacho G. Mac Dowell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Prepared 0.4 final. I have made Richard's changes in xjctask.xml. However, I am hesitating to check in because I am not sure if you are in the process of building. Should I just commit it to HEAD? regards, nacho PD: I think the best way to avoid this is to actually

Re: cvs commit: ws-jaxme status.xml build.xml

2005-05-20 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On 5/20/05, Nacho G. Mac Dowell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have made Richard's changes in xjctask.xml. However, I am hesitating to check in because I am not sure if you are in the process of building. Should I just commit it to HEAD? 0.4 is out, so feel free to commit in 0.4 as well.

cvs commit: ws-jaxme status.xml

2005-04-20 Thread jochen
jochen 2005/04/20 12:30:04 Modified:src/jaxme/org/apache/ws/jaxme/generator/sg/impl Tag: v0_4 JAXBTypeSG.java .Tag: v0_4 status.xml Log: Enabled support for xs:entity. Revision ChangesPath No revision No

cvs commit: ws-jaxme status.xml

2005-04-20 Thread jochen
jochen 2005/04/20 12:30:15 Modified:src/jaxme/org/apache/ws/jaxme/generator/sg/impl JAXBTypeSG.java .status.xml Log: Enabled support for xs:entity. Revision ChangesPath 1.14 +4 -5

cvs commit: ws-jaxme status.xml

2005-04-07 Thread jochen
jochen 2005/04/07 13:28:47 Modified:.status.xml Log: Revision ChangesPath 1.42 +7 -0 ws-jaxme/status.xml Index: status.xml === RCS file: /home/cvs/ws-jaxme/status.xml,v