Re: 3.4.10

Jbase 3.x is a 32 bit system and will not install on Win 7 64b. You can put a 32b version of windows 7 on a 64b platform though. Richard COmp-Ware On 2/25/2016 11:45 AM, David Grenfell wrote: Good morning all: Just curious. I attempted an install on windows 7, 64 bit and was rejected.

3.4.10

Good morning all: Just curious. I attempted an install on windows 7, 64 bit and was rejected. Does this mean that 3.4.10 will not install on windows 10 either, or is there a setting that could fool it into thinking that it is being installed on a 32 bit system ? Dave Grenfell -- --

Re: 3.4.10

Zumasys actually has an install for 3.4 for Windows 64-bit. Alan Fields alan.fie...@verizon.net -Original Message- From: David Grenfell To: jbase Sent: Thu, Feb 25, 2016 8:45 am Subject: 3.4.10 Good morning all: Just curious. I

RE: 3.4.10

The version that Alan is alluding to is a new build of jBASE 3.4.10 which is 64 bit aware and will install correctly on a 64 bit Windows platform. Mike From: jbase@googlegroups.com [mailto:jbase@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Richard Kann Sent: 25 February 2016 18:13 To:

RE: 3.4.10

Richard, The new build of jBASE 3.4.10 is still 32 bit, but it is 64bit aware, so will install correctly on a 64 bit system, which was not the case with the original version. Mike From: jbase@googlegroups.com [mailto:jbase@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Richard Kann Sent: 25 February

Re: 3.4.10

So bottomline, I can have a Win 7 64b system, run Jbase 3.4.10 and it will work. Why go to 5,x then? On 2/25/2016 1:55 PM, Mike Street wrote: Richard, The new build of jBASE 3.4.10 is still 32 bit, but it is 64bit aware, so will install correctly on a 64 bit system, which was not the case

RE: 3.4.10

Richard, jBASE 3.4.10 is still technology from 2005 and no new development has taken place since then. The new build is meant for customers who have a valid reason to stick with jBASE 3.4.x at the present time and gives them access to newer, supported Windows operating systems. jBASE 5

Re: 3.4.10

Mike, So you are saying I did not have to go to 5.x? I was told if I wanted 64 bit I had no choice. Richard Kann Comp-Ware On 2/25/2016 1:32 PM, Mike Street wrote: The version that Alan is alluding to is a new build of jBASE 3.4.10 which is 64 bit aware and will install correctly on a 64

RE: 3.4.10

Remember, it is still 32 bit limited, even though it will run on a 64 bit machine. File and index sizes limits are still the same. From: jbase@googlegroups.com [mailto:jbase@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Richard Kann Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2016 2:08 PM To: jbase@googlegroups.com

Re: 3.4.10

So if I have a client that is on 3.x and wants to get a new system and for some reason does not want to upgrade to 5.x he does not need to. Correct? Granted anyone new and anyone who wants to take advantage of the new 5.x features should go to 5,x anyway. On 2/25/2016 2:52 PM, Mike Street

RE: 3.4.10

Richard, Unless there is a valid reason for a specific customer to stick with jBASE 3.4.x, then they should be encouraged to move with the times and upgrade to jBASE 5. Why would you want to upgrade to the latest and greatest Windows version and then run 10+ year old jBASE software on it,