Hey all.
Has anyone done some serious load testing on JBoss 2.2 and has some results
to share ?
How many requests can it take , for how long ?
Thanks.
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss
User: tobyallsopp
Date: 01/04/15 23:03:51
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ejb AutoDeployer.java
AutoDeployerMBean.java
Log:
Further to the recent AutoDeployer mods, this adds support to AutoDeployer
for using multiple deployers so that a single AutoDeployer ser
User: tobyallsopp
Date: 01/04/15 23:03:50
Modified:src/etc/conf/default jboss.jcml
Log:
Further to the recent AutoDeployer mods, this adds support to AutoDeployer
for using multiple deployers so that a single AutoDeployer service can watch
for all supported application component
At 13:23 16.4.2001 +1200, you wrote:
>What this comes down to is: what exactly should go into the 2.2.x
>releases? Is it only bug fixes with no new features, or is it also
>low-risk new features?
Primarily bug fixes.
-- Juha
___
Jboss-development m
Bugs item #416377, was updated on 2001-04-15 20:24
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=416377&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v2.2 (stable)
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Dan Christopherson (danch)
Assigned to: Dan Christop
Toby Allsopp wrote:
> Hi, all.
>
> I've just made some changes that are more features enhancements than bug
> fixes, and I'm not sure whether I should be merging them into the 2.2
> branch.
>
> What this comes down to is: what exactly should go into the 2.2.x
> releases? Is it only bug fixes
Bugs item #416376, was updated on 2001-04-15 20:18
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=416376&group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: v2.2 (stable)
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Dan Christopherson (danch)
Assigned to: Dan Christopherson
User: tobyallsopp
Date: 01/04/15 19:03:45
Modified:business cvs.html jboss-jbosscx.html
Log:
Updated some JBossCX info.
Revision ChangesPath
1.9 +1 -0 newsite/business/cvs.html
Index: cvs.html
Hi, all.
I've just made some changes that are more features enhancements than bug
fixes, and I'm not sure whether I should be merging them into the 2.2
branch.
What this comes down to is: what exactly should go into the 2.2.x
releases? Is it only bug fixes with no new features, or is it also
Jason Dillon wrote:
> Is there any reason why we aren't specifying "org.jboss.*", for the
> packagenames attribute value?
Well, my excuse is that I didn't read the docs for the Ant javadoc task.
Using wildcards seems like a maintainability win to me. I say go right
ahead.
Toby.
Is there any reason why we aren't specifying "org.jboss.*", for the
packagenames attribute value?
--jason
On Sat, 14 Apr 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> User: tobyallsopp
> Date: 01/04/14 22:12:12
>
> Modified:src/build build.xml
> Log:
> Removed org.jboss.dependencies from list o
Hi,
On Sat, 14 Apr 2001, Jason Dillon wrote:
> Just to clarify, I should talk to Peter about adding a openjms contrib
> module.
Yes, he knows the code.
> And for the tests, this is from the jbosstest module... perhaps
> the bin/mdbtest.sh script?
Yep.
> Is there more documentation on this
12 matches
Mail list logo
